Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Female Goldeneye (c)

Discussion

12 replies
Posted by Dennis Alden on November 14, 2006 at 12:28 PM
Female Goldeneye (c)
Taken at Pensthorpe on Sunday. I never have quite the same sense of achievement when taking pictures of captive birds/animals but I was quite pleased with this.

As ever comments & crits welcome

Canon 20D
300mm f4LUIS
iso 200 -2/3 RAW
1/500 @ f5.6

Processed with Capture one
Cropped/levels/curves/sharpened with CS2


Posted by David Kjaer on November 14, 2006 at 1:57 PM
Hi Dennis

Your techs in this image look spot on but I would have preferred more room on the right and a lower shooting angle!

David :toast:
Posted by Helge Sorensen on November 14, 2006 at 2:23 PM
Hi Dennis, I agree with Davids comments above, but one thing in particular I like with this shot: When I shoot wild Goldeneyes I always tend to get some blur in the pupil of the eye. Here it's very nice and sharp. Good job :wavey:
Posted by Philip Kirkham on November 14, 2006 at 4:04 PM
Hello Dennis
Dave has said it all, but still a nice result.
Best wishes
Phil :toast:
Posted by Dennis Alden on November 15, 2006 at 3:14 AM
Thanks for your comments - taken on board. I was standing on a wooden bridge that spans one of the lakes but I think with a bit of thought I could have achieved a lower shooting position. I guess I was a bit over zealous with the crop on the right hand side - I think I was trying to get the eye as close to the intersection of thirds as I could and became fixated on that!

As for the eye Helge - hmmmm a wild Goldeneye with a slightly soft eye (and I'm sure with your standards the emphasis would be on the "slightly") or a captive bird with a pin sharp eye...... tough choice LOL

thanks again

dennis
Posted by Tim Munsey on November 15, 2006 at 3:26 AM
A nice study, it's not easy to get good shots of even captive birds, it seems an angle finder would be good to have in such a situation.

:toast: :toast:

Tim
Posted by PhilH on November 15, 2006 at 5:10 AM
Shows the eye superbly but agree with the other comments re crop and viewpoint, if staying with the tightness of this crop the eye should really have been on the left hand intersection so the duck was looking in to the image rather than out. The techs look to be spot on....

:toast: :toast:
Posted by John Chapman on November 15, 2006 at 5:21 AM
Hi Dennis
I agree with David's comments but it is so Sharp :toast:
John
Aberdeen
Posted by John Gardner on November 15, 2006 at 8:53 AM
Agree with DK et al but sharp and well exposed.

John
Posted by Chris Lloyd on November 15, 2006 at 4:31 PM
Hi Dennis,

I would've gone for the lower angle if possible here and left more room on the right, but that eye is razor sharp.

Regards Chris
www.c-m-l.com
Posted by Sean Bolton on November 15, 2006 at 5:18 PM
Hi Dennis

Nice pose and lovely water texture. I too would have tried for a lower shooting angle if possible, no excuses at Pensthorpe..... :smile:

cheers

Sean
Posted by Dennis Alden on November 16, 2006 at 3:09 AM
The only excuse I have Sean is that I had totally misjudged the weather and was slowly freezing to death - the biting wind was going straighht through my fleece! I realise this is a very poor excuse for an spiring wildlife photographer and that suffering for one's art is mandatory :wink:

Thanks for all the comments and suggestions much appreciated

dennis
Posted by Graeme Lee on November 16, 2006 at 5:53 PM
The nits have been covered, but great detail and exposure looks great.

:toast:

Graeme