NPN has moved to naturephotographers.networkYou’re viewing the read-only archive of the original site (2000–2018). The community is active today, with new critiques and discussions every day.
Swami, We all seem to be unable to comment on this very nice shot. Maybe because we are not used to so much man-made stuff in the images shown here. I enjoy looking at this, its now the 4th time I have opened it. At first I thought,wider, but I see it is at 17mm now. Then I thought, higher, but you probably didnt bring a ladder. Maybe my confusion will cause others to comment. It's still very nice.
I didn't expect this one to be such a conversation killer. Have I again stepped too far outside the NPN box? (another conversation to have sometime is what exactly I have come to observe as the "NPN box", it's certainly more constrained than "nature photography". e.g., what happened to Thomas_m and others who aren't trying to make wall hangings for waiting rooms?)
I see this as a picture in three parts: first the view down the bridge, and then taking a step back and looking left and right.
Posted by Rick Lamb on November 27, 2006 at 7:11 PM
Mike I'm groovin on this quite well!!! A great play on lines and super execution with spot on DOF!!
Discussion
4 repliesNov 21, D200, 17-35 @17 mm, ISO 100, polarizer, 1/3 sec;F/5 + 1/8 sec;F/5 (water highlights).
I didn't expect this one to be such a conversation killer. Have I again stepped too far outside the NPN box? (another conversation to have sometime is what exactly I have come to observe as the "NPN box", it's certainly more constrained than "nature photography". e.g., what happened to Thomas_m and others who aren't trying to make wall hangings for waiting rooms?)
I see this as a picture in three parts: first the view down the bridge, and then taking a step back and looking left and right.