Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Can i be cheeky........??

Discussion

32 replies
Posted by BATEY on January 15, 2007 at 1:46 PM
Being fairly new to all this photoshop lark and just learning step by step i wondered if any of you more experienced photoshoppers would be willing to have a tweak with one of my images, been out today taking a few pics and would just like to see what can be done with an image ... will email if any takers!!!!

Posted by Tim Munsey on January 15, 2007 at 2:13 PM
Go on then send me a copy.

Tim
Posted by stewart canham on January 15, 2007 at 2:13 PM
Hi Andy. my e-mail address is canham 'at' gofast.co.uk, and I would be happy to have a play and see what we can do. I spend most of my working day in Photoshop, so If I can help feel free to ask any questions..........

Stewart..............
Posted by Phillip Tomkinson on January 15, 2007 at 2:20 PM
Hi send me one.

Phillip.

philliptomkinson 'at' blueyonder.co.uk
Posted by Rob Howard on January 15, 2007 at 2:35 PM
Hi Andy,

I love having a tinker, send me one please.

robert.howard10"at"btopenworld.com

Regards

Rob
Posted by Brian McGeough on January 15, 2007 at 2:37 PM
Hi Andy,

Don't forget to let us see the results of some of this photoshopping!!! :biggrin:

Brian
Posted by Vincent Jones on January 15, 2007 at 2:38 PM
I would love to have ago to.

email is vince at barnowl.co.uk

Regards

Vince :toast:

PS: Can we upload the finish result?
Posted by Sean Bolton on January 15, 2007 at 2:43 PM
Hi Andy

I would suggest posting your image on the forum and invite everyone to have a go with it. Forum members can then post back their revised versions for discussion. I reckon we all could learn something from this exercise.

cheers

Sean
Posted by Vincent Jones on January 15, 2007 at 2:50 PM
Hi Sean :wavey:

I think it would be better to upload ours first then upload the original followed by Andy's mod

Just an idea :biggrin:
Posted by Rob Fisher on January 15, 2007 at 2:56 PM
Hi all,

This sounds like a great idea. I agree we could all learn somthing from this.

I look forward to looking at the results.

Rob
Posted by Tim Munsey on January 15, 2007 at 2:56 PM
My email is t.s.munsey 'at' leeds.ac.uk
I just spotted a lack of attachment thingy with npn email facility.

Tim
Posted by Paul Williams on January 15, 2007 at 3:03 PM
This should be fun and very useful.......fire me a copy too! - p.williams 'at' lancaster.ac.uk

Paul
Posted by BATEY on January 15, 2007 at 4:14 PM
will email you all now!! wow, what a response, pressure is on to choose a decent image now!!!
Posted by BATEY on January 15, 2007 at 4:32 PM
Email sent!!!
Posted by Tim Munsey on January 15, 2007 at 4:56 PM
Here's my effort.
Posted by Rob Howard on January 15, 2007 at 5:00 PM
OK here's mine!!

Regards

Rob
Posted by BATEY on January 15, 2007 at 5:03 PM
nice tim, what did you do?
Posted by Tim Munsey on January 15, 2007 at 5:11 PM
Now that would be telling :biggrin: .
I opened it up in Nikon NX reduced the exposure to recover blown areas, used D-lighting to bring it back to life, went to photoshop for cropping, sharpening, spot removal (boy have you got a dirty sensor), noise reduction, some curve fiddling to bring up the midtones careful not to effect whites. I did some local contrast work, saved the file and opened it up in breezebrowser, proofed it for the web, opened it back up in photoshop to do a final sharpen and oops adjusted file size to 100kb, dam I should've sharpened after this but hey.

Cheers

Tim
Posted by BATEY on January 15, 2007 at 5:13 PM
thanks, yes the sensor needs a little bit of a clean!!!!
Posted by Paul Williams on January 15, 2007 at 5:29 PM
Ok. here's my go.....

Posted by BATEY on January 15, 2007 at 5:33 PM
how did you do it???
Posted by Paul Williams on January 15, 2007 at 6:54 PM
Errr…..I forgot!.....well not quite…. I think I do this sort of stuff intuitively nowadays. One thing for certain is that I refuse to spend vast amounts of time on an image. If I have to spend more than maybe ten to fifteen minutes on a shot then I know that I’ve messed up the bit that matters i.e. taking the shot in the first place.

I’ve no doubt that everyone else who has a go at this will have a different workflow. My workflow depends on what I’m seeing in the image when I open it. Some experts may be horrified when they read the workflow below, but it seems to work for me! On occasions I do play with curves and other stuff but on the whole I just like to keep things as easy and quick as possible.

Anyway, for this one I kept it very simple, I opened in NC4.4, reset to low contrast and knocked back the exposure just over half a stop to recover the highlights. Also gave it a bit of a colour boost in NC (only a bit).

I then passed it over to PS2. Added a bit more saturation and lightness in the Hue/Saturation dialog box, and then adjusted the contrast and brightness a bit. Did a first sharpen (150, 0.2, 0) and then resized for web. Had a minor fiddle with the brightness and contrast again and then ran two or three unsharp masks at the previous settings………and that was it as they say.

Paul

P.S I couldn't be bothered sorting the dirt out! :biggrin:
Posted by Phillip Tomkinson on January 15, 2007 at 7:30 PM
Hi hear's mine I used nikon capture 4.4.2 I have a preset set off settings that I use for my images I applied this and then set the white bal from its forhead then reset the red and blue channel to a value of 1, then sent it to photoshop 7 gave it a light going over with neat image then selected the background and gave that another going over with neat image then a final round of USM at 100, .6 , 0.

Phillip.

:toast: :toast: :toast: :wavey:
Posted by BATEY on January 16, 2007 at 4:16 AM
thanks everyone, did anyone like the photo???
Posted by Brian McGeough on January 16, 2007 at 5:34 AM
Hi all,

Looks like the sun went in between Tims and Phillips convertion :biggrin: ,
and yes any nice pecker picture too Andy.

Brian
Posted by BATEY on January 16, 2007 at 3:20 PM
which version to people prefer????
Posted by Nick on January 16, 2007 at 3:47 PM
Which version...?

What time/light was the 'pecker photographed in?
Posted by BATEY on January 16, 2007 at 3:51 PM
was mid afternoon with a low warm sun
Posted by Rob Fisher on January 16, 2007 at 6:01 PM
Hi,

I like the photo, it's a nice portrait. :toast:

It's tough to call between Tim and Paul's but I guess Paul's has it for me.

I think Paul’s effort is slightly sharper.

Well done all, very interesting to see general workflow techniques. :toast:

Rob
Posted by Nick on January 16, 2007 at 6:18 PM
'..mid afternoon with a low warm sun'
...then I'd probably pick something somewhere between Philip's version and Rob's version. Tim's and Paul's appear too 'warm' to my eye, even for late afternoon at this time of year.
Posted by Rob Howard on January 17, 2007 at 5:10 PM
Hi All,

Sorry just got back to this, Have I posted mine the incorrect way to how the image was taken it's just when I rotated it in CS2 it looked odd upright :confused: but the image did look like it was taken with the pecker upside down??
Am I right or am I losing the plot :biggrin:

Regards

Rob
Posted by BATEY on January 18, 2007 at 10:33 AM
pecker was taken upright
Posted by Niall Riddell on January 20, 2007 at 10:58 AM
This is an incredibly useful thread - thanks to everyone who worked on the image - I am now starting to understnad some of the stuff I need to do to optimise my own images.

Thanks!
Niall