Posted by Curtis Knight on January 16, 2007 at 8:03 PM
Now I'm beginning to wonder about this... I assumed when I saw it that it must be the comet with some kind of atmospheric distortion... But after talking to a couple people, I shouldn't have been able to see it move, right? it was perceptively moving across the sky from north to south (left to right in the frame). Anyone with real knowledge of astronomy have a theory?
Posted by Curtis Knight on January 16, 2007 at 8:12 PM
Well I was thinking maybe a Sky Train...
Posted by Eric Hahl on January 16, 2007 at 8:55 PM
Its Venus Dude!
Posted by Ned Fenimore on January 16, 2007 at 9:06 PM
What's with the wavy tail though??
Posted by Harald Rust on January 16, 2007 at 10:13 PM
Curtis,
We saw the same thing in the Western sky on the way to the Washington coast on Sunday.
At the time, we wondered if it could be the comet, but then thought it looked like an odd shaped contrail or cloud just sitting there in the sky.
Harald
Posted by Eric Hahl on January 16, 2007 at 10:25 PM
The comet is long gone. last evening to really see it was Friday the 12th.
I thought Venus first because I thought maybe Curtis moved the camera...I'm stupid though, the trees aint movin. I have no clue what it is.
Posted by Geoff Shapiro on January 16, 2007 at 10:51 PM
Eric, it still could have been camera movement. The object (most likely Venus - check out the sky chart at http://skytonight.com/observing/ataglance) is very bright and a little movement of the camera will cause the bright object to "smear" easily on the sensor. The trees, being dark, would take quite a bit more in a long exposure to show out. At least that's my take on it...
Curtis, I went out to shoot it the night after I saw it in the paper. Couldnt find it. Went to happy hour at Parker House Restaurant on the Columbia the next night and about 20 Min after sunset it poped up below and to the right of venus and slowly sunk into the columbia in about 15Min. Moved at the same speed as the sunset. Tail was very misty as you would expect a comet to be. Of course the camera was at home, but had the whole bar over at the windows.
Posted by Curtis Knight on January 17, 2007 at 1:59 AM
I guarantee it's not camera shake. the camera was on the tripod, and this is also what it looked like to the naked eye... It ain't camera shake. Now you guys got me really curious. I don't think venus is that big...
Also, this is the eastern sky... isn't the comet supposed to be in the west?
Posted by Geoff Shapiro on January 17, 2007 at 3:23 AM
Ok, just checked your original message and saw that this was a morning shot. That means that you are correct that it couldn't have been Venus, but Jupiter is in the southeastern sky at dawn so it was possibly that.
As far as camera shake... was it windy? Beyond that I can't explain the "smear".
UFO???
Posted by Eric Hahl on January 17, 2007 at 11:29 AM
How long did it stay this way Curtis?
Posted by Erik Lundh on January 17, 2007 at 2:16 PM
This is freaking weird. I have no explanation. Ya know, my brother has been known to shoot mermaids in the sky before.
Posted by Curtis Knight on January 17, 2007 at 4:33 PM
it was visible for roughly 2 minutes, and there was barely perceptible left to right motion. I think Erik figured it out though... it's one of Rick's mermaids...
Discussion
15 repliesCanon EOS DIGITAL REBEL
1/14/2007 7:43:59 AM
Tv( Shutter Speed )
1/8
Av( Aperture Value )
8.0
ISO Speed
100
Lens
70.0 - 200.0 mm
Focal Length
200.0 mm
We saw the same thing in the Western sky on the way to the Washington coast on Sunday.
At the time, we wondered if it could be the comet, but then thought it looked like an odd shaped contrail or cloud just sitting there in the sky.
Harald
I thought Venus first because I thought maybe Curtis moved the camera...I'm stupid though, the trees aint movin. I have no clue what it is.
Also, this is the eastern sky... isn't the comet supposed to be in the west?
As far as camera shake... was it windy? Beyond that I can't explain the "smear".
UFO???