Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Punchbowl Falls = Log Free ?

Discussion

9 replies
Posted by John Lehmkuhl on March 28, 2007 at 6:38 PM
I've seen a few photos recently that seem to show punchbowl without the famous Log in front of the falls. Anybody able to confirm if this log really is gone ?
Posted by Curtis Knight on March 28, 2007 at 7:09 PM
I did a little searching and found an image dated last september, and the log is still there, snickering at the photographer :biggrin: so I doubt that it is gone.
Posted by Andy Drumer on March 28, 2007 at 8:13 PM
I swam up past the log last fall and it was planted in there pretty solidly, enough so I started to climb it for the ultimate perspective but it was too steep and slippery. Where have you seen these photos?
Posted by IngeW on March 28, 2007 at 9:05 PM
Sean and I were out there a week and a half ago. The log is still there.

The trillium was stating to bloom too.
Posted by Ned Fenimore on March 29, 2007 at 12:36 AM
I saw a recent shot without a log... but it belonged to mermaid-man... aka the mad cloner.... :cool:
Posted by Rick Lundh on March 29, 2007 at 3:29 PM
I was there yesterday and this is the scene I saw... :wink:
Posted by John Lehmkuhl on March 29, 2007 at 6:25 PM
Yea, right and your camera has the flood plug-in built into it now..... :eek:
Posted by Curtis Knight on March 29, 2007 at 6:44 PM
The mermaid must have moved the log for him.
Posted by Bryan Swan on March 31, 2007 at 6:07 AM
I still say we tote a hack saw up there and solve the problem ourselves. :biggrin:
Posted by Darren White on April 1, 2007 at 3:24 PM
looks kind of funny without the log...I am so used to seeing it there that without it, it almost looks un-natural