Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Testing 123..

Discussion

7 replies
Posted by Leann Greene on June 25, 2007 at 11:59 AM
Testing 123..
Testing out the "Save as" method advice given to Thomas. This is 720 pixels at quality level of 7..
Posted by Leann Greene on June 25, 2007 at 12:02 PM
vs-altering size of image-this went down to under 550 pixels.
which suits you better?
Posted by John Zinn on June 25, 2007 at 1:49 PM
Leanne, I say bigger is better. I prefer the first though it has more JPEG compression. On my screen there aren't too many noticable artifacts, mostly because your file size is big enough. One thought though is that some additional sharpening may be in order in addition to using "Bicubic Sharper" to down-rez.

John
Posted by Leann Greene on June 25, 2007 at 4:04 PM
Thanks for replying John!
Posted by Lance Warley on June 25, 2007 at 6:36 PM
The first one looks better on my screen, too.
Posted by Leann Greene on June 25, 2007 at 7:53 PM
Thanks Lance for your input. :smile:
Posted by Richard Bernabe on June 26, 2007 at 8:19 AM
In this case, the bigger version looks better. It varies from image to image.
Posted by Matthew Cromer on June 26, 2007 at 9:51 AM
Another possible option is to host your pictures somewhere that allows a bigger file size, and then still direct link them here.

The file size restriction is just for files hosted on the photoportfolios site, unless there has been a change in policy that I am not aware of.