Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Which do you prefer?

Discussion

26 replies
Posted by Zack Schnepf on June 29, 2007 at 1:52 AM
Which do you prefer?
I just got back from a trip to the Olympics, I had to cut the trip short because of the storm that came in this night. No sweet light on this trip unfortunately, but some interesting stormy skies. Anyway, I'm curious which of these you prefer?

This is Rialto Beach
Posted by Zack Schnepf on June 29, 2007 at 1:53 AM
color
Posted by Trevor Anderson on June 29, 2007 at 1:57 AM
Black and white: it accentuates the drama. The color seems like it was pretty flat on that day. Great shot of a familiar area, Zack.
Posted by Zack Schnepf on June 29, 2007 at 1:58 AM
Yep, color was non existent this night :frown:
Posted by Kevin Hillegass on June 29, 2007 at 3:21 AM
B&W. But I always prefer B&W :biggrin:

Kevin
Posted by Ned Fenimore on June 29, 2007 at 9:11 AM
B&W for me!
Posted by Curtis Knight on June 29, 2007 at 9:46 AM
B&W
Posted by Eric Hahl on June 29, 2007 at 10:20 AM
The B&W definitely has more mood.
Posted by Simon Allenby on June 29, 2007 at 11:07 AM
Another vote for B&W.

Regards, Simon
Posted by Lance Warley on June 29, 2007 at 12:44 PM
Ditto for me...more impact for sure.
Posted by Michael Joubert on June 29, 2007 at 12:52 PM
B&W
Posted by Mike Dawson on June 29, 2007 at 1:15 PM
I vote b&W as well!

Mike
Posted by Darien Chin on June 29, 2007 at 1:49 PM
b+w, but I would like to see it a bit more contrasty. I think it would make more of an impact if the whites were a little whiter. Great shot with what you had to work with. Sometimes in weather like this, I get discouraged and just put my camera away.
Posted by Richard Sogn on June 29, 2007 at 2:35 PM
B & W is dramatic, color just average.
Posted by Tom Kloster on June 29, 2007 at 5:31 PM
B&W, and a bit more sky contrast, but I like it a lot as is. What was your shutter speed?

Tom
Posted by Zack Schnepf on June 29, 2007 at 5:38 PM
Thanks for all the comments, B&W is my clear fav as well, I like to get a second opinion though.

This was a 1 second exposure Tom. I experimented with a lot of different shutter speeds, and 1 sec was my favorite for this scene.

Here is a higher contrast version, let me know what you think?
Posted by Tom Kloster on June 29, 2007 at 5:43 PM
Perfect! That's a really nice image!

All of the ocean photography around here has inspired me to head west a bit more often, and start doing more of this. I'm a little nervous about exposing my gear to sand and salt water, Zack -- I'd be interested in hearing any tips you have for protecting your equipment when you're on the beach. I have never taken my DSLR on the beach out of concern for nuking it (...which I've managed to do with rainwater, anyway...)

Tom
Posted by Zack Schnepf on June 29, 2007 at 5:48 PM
I understand your concern Tom, the ocean is one of the more punishing environments for photo gear, especially if the wind is whipping the ocean spray all over your camera. That being said, I really don't worry too much about my gear, I protect it when I can, but when I'm in the heat of capturing a scene I throw caution to the wind usually. I do try to have a filter in front of the lens when it's really bad though so my repeated cleanings wont scratch my lens. The only other thing I do to protect my gear is just to leave it in the camera bag till the conditions are good enough. I bet Marc has some tips though, he shoots at the coast way more than I do.
Posted by John Lehmkuhl on June 29, 2007 at 7:16 PM
Z-man... sorry the storm took away the color. B&W 2nd version ROCKS...
Posted by Mark Windom on June 29, 2007 at 11:21 PM
B&W #2.
Posted by Rick Lundh on June 30, 2007 at 12:16 AM
I'll chime in here too with the BW as my fav as well, but still feel this could be more. If you dont mind, I've posted what I had in mind.

Now, this may or may not be out of your comfort zone for manipulation...however...one can convert an image to BW in camera...we choose to convert in PS. One can also add a photo filter on front of the lens, or do it in PS as well. Doesn't mean it has to be put in photo art forum...not one little bit.

What do you think?
Posted by Zack Schnepf on June 30, 2007 at 1:44 AM
Nice Rick, I like toning actually. Toning can really enhance and change the mood of an image as in this case, but I still like the high contrast B&W the best myself.
Posted by Catherine Reilly on June 30, 2007 at 2:02 AM
Well, okay fellas... There has to be one sour apple in the crate, and I guess it's me this time. :rolleyes:
Of the two B&W, I like #1. The color version really speaks "WA Coast" to me. No rotten egg throwing, now, it's just the way I see it! :biggrin:
What I love the most about this image is all that world of water radiating out to me from the haystack. I feel like I'm standing there and about to get it! Great shot.
Posted by Rick Lundh on June 30, 2007 at 9:01 AM
Zack,
I really can't decide now, but I may be leaning towards your BW version...with maybe a hair more shadow detail in that awesome point. The comp and shutter speed is spot on, fo sho!
Posted by Darien Chin on June 30, 2007 at 10:31 AM
I like the contrasty one better :smile:
Posted by Jerry Gowins on July 3, 2007 at 12:30 PM
Beautiful image!! B&W here as well. Well done!

Jerry
Posted by Mike Stovall on July 3, 2007 at 9:09 PM
Personally, I like the color version better. But since the color is not the most striking feature of this photo, the B&W version will keep viewers focused on it's strong points (form, motion, and texture.) Of the two B&W images, I like the higher contrast version better.