Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

old ruby beach shot...

Discussion

10 replies
Posted by michael medina on July 12, 2007 at 1:04 AM
circa | 1998 | nikon f3 | nikkor either 28mm f3.5 or 35-70 f3.3-4.5 | f22 or 16 | velvia

i'm going to post this photo for feedback so i can see what everyone else thinks.

i have my opinion on it, but i want yours :wink:



edit: i should note that this is almost a raw scan, scanner 'haze' removed and sharpened for web only
Posted by Bryan Swan on July 12, 2007 at 2:37 AM
Compositionally, this is pretty powerful, but the light is fairly bland and doesn't lend the extra 'oomph' that this image needs to push it over the top, imho. I think this scene half an hour later would have been fantastic.
Posted by michael medina on July 12, 2007 at 4:26 AM
yeah, the scan is much more drab than the chrome there's a lot more color in the sky, i'll process it a bit and replace it sometime tomorrow (today)
Posted by Darren White on July 12, 2007 at 11:57 AM
nice and sharp.......I like it
Posted by Eric Hahl on July 12, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Great comp Michael, I really like this. I also agree with the comments about waiting a bit longer for the sweet light.
Posted by michael medina on July 12, 2007 at 1:24 PM
i've reposted it with color corrections as close to the slide as i can get. although i think something in the process of saving for web added some saturation (which is actually strange but not undesirable)

it's a bit late to wait for the sunset on this one, it was taken almost 10 years ago :wink:
however, i don't think those rocks are going anywhere and i shoot 6x7 now, i could always go back

i've had this one sitting around and never felt that good about it, then just recently showed to a few people and they thought i was crazy for never printing it.


Posted by Mike Stovall on July 12, 2007 at 2:18 PM
I like this, Michael. I agree that the strong point is the composition, and the timing--with the sea foam making lines leading back into the ocean is great. There may have been even prettier light later on, but there is still some color there. It is what it is...

But I have the same problem in PS--exaggerating my colors when I save to web. I didn't have this problem with CS2 and can't quite pin it down. It's a bit better if I convert the profile to sRGB before doing save to web. But I end up having to desaturate and export several times to get it to match what I see in PS. I have the "convert to sRGB" setting selected in the save to web tool, but I'm at a loss... If you figure out what's going on please let me know too!
Posted by Brian Hudspeth on July 12, 2007 at 2:18 PM
I like it, great composition and details..
Posted by michael medina on July 12, 2007 at 9:13 PM
Mike Stovall

i habitually save for web, but if you convert to sRGB and just save as normal jpg, it should look the same if i'm not mistaken. to reduce file size there are ways to strip out the image thumbnail and it ends up almost the same size. i have used different contextual menu utilities to do this in the past on mac, i don't know what they have for windows though
Posted by Harald Rust on July 12, 2007 at 9:39 PM
I like it, particularly the detail in the fg sea foaming over the rocks. I feel like I'm standing there.
Harald
Posted by Rick Lundh on July 12, 2007 at 11:48 PM
Great comp Michael!