Posted by Zack Schnepf on July 14, 2007 at 10:32 PM
Probably my favorite from this morning, I feel like I'm there again which is a successful image IMO.
Thanks for any comments.
Posted by Zack Schnepf on July 14, 2007 at 10:38 PM
Here is a vertical version to compare, I like the horizontal image, but I think this has it's strengths as well.
Posted by Hans Hibbard on July 14, 2007 at 10:56 PM
The clouds, the grass, the curve of the hills, and even the lighting are working better in the landscape-oriented version. Great shot!
It looks like it might have a clockwise tilt.
Posted by Zack Schnepf on July 15, 2007 at 12:24 AM
Good call Hans, I think it was a bit tilted, and there are a couple of optical illusions that make it look even more pronounced. Here is a corrected version.
Zack,
I agree with you, the landscape version is the winner here. Great subject and great detail here. I personally blow this place off because of its limited venue, but you and Marc (and Erik) have shown me otherwise.
Posted by Curtis Knight on July 15, 2007 at 11:18 AM
nice work Zack. It's wierd how the hills make everything look tilted on 2D media.
Posted by Kevin Pieper on July 15, 2007 at 12:18 PM
I like both versions, but the landscape is stonger imo. Really nice color palette with some greens in the grasses.
Very nice image Zach. After the tilt correction it looks fantastic. I always try to shoot an image vertical and horizontal as it is always good to have both versions for stock or editorial purposes.
Discussion
10 repliesThanks for any comments.
It looks like it might have a clockwise tilt.
I agree with you, the landscape version is the winner here. Great subject and great detail here. I personally blow this place off because of its limited venue, but you and Marc (and Erik) have shown me otherwise.