Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Sunset on the Lake

Discussion

19 replies
Posted by Marc Adamus on August 26, 2007 at 11:45 AM
Sunset on the Lake
Not what you were expecting?


5D, 70-200 at 120mm, 1/80 sec. at F16, ISO 400.
Posted by Darren White on August 26, 2007 at 11:53 AM
I have to admit Marc, it's not often you post an image where you have left out some detail......I do wish there was some kind of line between the top of the rock and the reflection....The colors are great as always......
Posted by Marc Adamus on August 26, 2007 at 11:57 AM
Interesting. I guess I could leave it there, but I intentionally took out all detail in the rock because it simplified the image for me. I guess I could experiment with various levels of detail in the rock itself some more. I would certainly find too much detail to be a distraction, however.
Posted by Hans Hibbard on August 26, 2007 at 12:08 PM
I vote for some rock detail Marc. As with Catherine's recent shot, I'm a sucker for these water reflecting light comps. I really like the shades of blue that you've captured across the scene. The ripples next to the rock add a dynamic "ringing" effect. Cool shot!
Posted by Marc Adamus on August 26, 2007 at 12:09 PM
Not a problem. Here it is with more detail. Thanks for the suggestions.
Posted by Darren White on August 26, 2007 at 12:15 PM
I like it.......it really adds to the depth of the image.....now lets see the landscapes you got from your trip....BTW, nice article in Pop Photo....I just read it the other day!
Posted by Trevor Anderson on August 26, 2007 at 1:05 PM
An interesting departure from the big and bold. I'm not necessarily feeling the current placement of the rock; my eye would grasp the scene more effortlessly if it were to be placed in one of the lower corners. I like the image without the detail--it renders it as a more abstract and original effort.
Posted by Jeremy Cram on August 26, 2007 at 1:29 PM
Wow dude! You actually captured proof of the rare NW alpine shark! lol.

Sweet color! I like it. :toast:
Posted by Jack Graham on August 26, 2007 at 1:31 PM
Marc,
I too play around with this kind of photography. I'm finding that I am doing it more & more, especially when the light isn't great. The blues & pinks work great and the sharpness, yet smooth water works wonderfully.
JG
Posted by Richard Sogn on August 26, 2007 at 4:14 PM
I like the first image, very, very, much.
Posted by Zack Schnepf on August 26, 2007 at 5:42 PM
Alpine lake shark... LOL.

Lovely study in bending light, I don't have a preference between the 2 versions.
Posted by IngeW on August 26, 2007 at 6:13 PM
The first image is simple and very pleasant. Nicely seen and captured.
Posted by Mark Windom on August 26, 2007 at 6:33 PM
I really like the colors and patterns on the surface of the water but am undecided about the rock being there. Between the two my vote goes to #2.
Posted by Khristian Snyder on August 26, 2007 at 8:47 PM
I love this image....it almost like a miniature scale of a mountain in a huge lake....I love the repeating patterns and texture.
Posted by Adrian Klein on August 26, 2007 at 10:38 PM
Correct, not what I was expecting! But nontheless a cool image. I am unsure which of the two I like better. The one w/o any detail in the rock is more dramatic to me and probably the way I would have first done it too for this type of piece. However, there is something to be said about seeing the detail in the blacks on the 2nd one. Both look great to me!
Posted by John Lehmkuhl on August 27, 2007 at 12:19 AM
Cool image, no doubt. The water reflection reminds me a bit of the Kai Power Tools 2.1 plug-in "Texture Explorer". Some of the coolest plug-ins ever made for photoshop...... I like the version without any rock detail. Makes it more mysterious and keeps sense of scale off the table.
Posted by Bryan Swan on August 27, 2007 at 1:10 AM
Definitely unexpected and very cool at that. I'll deviate from the majority and say that I much prefer the silhouetted version of the rock - the water is what should be drawing the eye's attention, not the detail in the rock.
Posted by Rick Lundh on August 27, 2007 at 3:43 AM
Well, I like both, but the 2nd is just enough to try and figure it out. I think I would prefer this scene without any rock, just having the water ripples and color.
Posted by Catherine Reilly on August 27, 2007 at 4:00 AM
Ha! Marc! My kind of image. Especially the first one lets your imagination define what the black shape is... or isn't. The suggestion is there in the rings and whorls on each side of the rock. The second version is great too. I like them both.
Posted by Eric Hahl on August 27, 2007 at 11:14 AM
The first image is more artful, the second...more technical. I vote in favor of art.