Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

ColorBox and Matte paper

Discussion

9 replies
Posted by Andy Brehm on August 28, 2007 at 1:31 PM
I know a few of you use ColorBox mounting instead of traditional framing and was curious about your results. I have two rolls of matte paper (Entrada Rag and Hahnemmuhle fine art smooth) and was wanting to have this mounted using the ColorBox method. Will this look alright or should I stick to my coated satin paper?

Thanks,
andy
Posted by Jesse Speer on August 28, 2007 at 4:11 PM
I haven't colorplak'd anything on matte yet, so take my comments with a grain of salt.

No matter what paper you use, the process does slightly reduce overall contrast and/or dmax of your print. Even more so with matte papers, I would imagine, where this is already an issue (vs. glossy/luster/satin papers). I would add an adjustment layer before printing on your matte to boost contrast a little bit. Then I think it would probably be fine. And then certainly try a small mounted sample or two. That's what I was going to do anyway - eventually.

I'd LOVE to hear about your experience, as I will be offering a matte paper soon.
Posted by Scott Bacon on August 28, 2007 at 4:13 PM
I've only done traditional prints on matte surface photo paper (obviously not the same as you're inquiring about) and inkjets on premium luster. I'm wondering if the matte papers might have too much surface texture? I don't know, but I'll be interested to hear what others have to say...
Posted by Brent Murphy on August 28, 2007 at 5:07 PM
When I've had ColorPlak mounting done at Picture This Superior, they recommended using glossy paper, since the laminating process dulls the image a bit. I would probably stick with their recommendation and use a glossier paper instead of matte.

I also know they have to do something extra when working with inkjets in lieu of traditional photo prints. Not sure what, though.
Posted by Brett Deacon on August 28, 2007 at 6:28 PM
I've had basically the same process as ColorBox mounting done with Crane Silver Rag inkjet paper, which has a texture at least as pronounced as most matte papers, with no ill effects. I'll second the deleterious effects on color vividness and dmax though. This summer I framed a print on Silver Rag with no lamination or glass - just 3 thick coats of PremierArt Print Shield protective spray. The finished product looked incredible - outstanding color saturation, deep blacks, and a more even "sheen" than the regular surface of the paper. I'd love to hear from anyone else who has done this.
Posted by George Hager on August 29, 2007 at 1:56 AM
I have had some regular photo paper semi-mat prints laminated with no problem. I am using a satin and linen finish that has almost no effect on the color and sharpness of the image like the mat finish does. I can't stand that stuff. Tomorrow I will get some images back that were printed (Epson) on a fine art type paper and laminated with a satin finish. I'll let you know how they turn out.
Posted by CAZ on August 29, 2007 at 6:29 AM
George - What lab or service company are you using? Are you having just the print laminated or are they using that finish in the ColorPlak mounting process?

Thanks,

CAZ
Posted by Richard Voninski on August 29, 2007 at 11:49 AM
I have had many images laminated by Rick up at PIcture This. I have been using Epson Premium Luster with great success. Some images done with Colorplak . I have not used any matte papers in the process. My gut just thinks that it wouldnt work as well. But I have no evidence of that.

BTW - Rick (PIctureThis) no longer charges any premium for laminating inkjet prints.

RichieV

Posted by George Hager on August 29, 2007 at 6:30 PM
CAZ,

I just got back from picking up a bunch of work. I use Artist Showcase in Denver. They have some unique laminates and are always trying out new products. Works for me.
Posted by CAZ on August 30, 2007 at 9:29 AM
Thanks George!