When "ordinary" layers photo was in the bag, I tried something different: three frames stitched together.
500+1.4, tripod, digital
Cheers,
Marko
Posted by Paul Gibbs on October 30, 2007 at 7:12 AM
Looks nice!
Posted by Andy Astbury on October 30, 2007 at 8:19 AM
Hi Marko - another fine mach band image
But to be honest I prefer the first one, especially the tonal and colour range
I think here the tonal range doesn't look quite as impressive, the sky is a bit too vivid and the big shame is how the far mountain is nearly hidden complety by the middle one.
Please don't get me wrong though, it's a mighty fine image - just not flicking my switch as much as the first one
Posted by Marko Trebušak on October 30, 2007 at 12:01 PM
Andy, believe it or not, colour of the sky is quite close to RAW image! One can't believe how saturated sunset can be above 2000 m! I do agree with your other points. That mountain is a bit dominant and haze has burned out by now.
Lovely image, I agree with Andy that I prefer the first image, but there is little in it. I like the pano format and am not too worried about the central mountain. The colours yet again are breathtaking.
John Lee
Posted by Graeme Lee on October 30, 2007 at 7:46 PM
Another superbly done image Marko. Prefer the first one just due to the layers all being more defined amongst the other layers ...incredible colours
Discussion
6 replies500+1.4, tripod, digital
Cheers,
Marko
But to be honest I prefer the first one, especially the tonal and colour range
I think here the tonal range doesn't look quite as impressive, the sky is a bit too vivid and the big shame is how the far mountain is nearly hidden complety by the middle one.
Please don't get me wrong though, it's a mighty fine image - just not flicking my switch as much as the first one
Cheers,
Marko
Lovely image, I agree with Andy that I prefer the first image, but there is little in it. I like the pano format and am not too worried about the central mountain. The colours yet again are breathtaking.
John Lee