Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Peekaboo

Discussion

11 replies
Posted by John Williams on November 11, 2007 at 10:59 AM
Peekaboo
I digiscoped these juvenile Great Horned Owls at Malheur NWR.
Posted by Hans Sager on November 11, 2007 at 11:07 AM
Beautiful shot John. Composition, exposure, color, DOF and sharpness are all spot on. My only suggestion for improvement is to clone out the hint of the dark branch in the URC.
:toast:

BTW...what is digiscoping? Using a digital camera as opposed to film? Just curious.
Posted by Rick Lamb on November 11, 2007 at 3:43 PM
hmmmm to my eye this is a VERY soft image. Other than that capturing/observing these guys must have been VERY groovy!!!

I know I'm on a groovy binge this weekend - bare with me man....DOH!!
Posted by David Schoen on November 11, 2007 at 5:45 PM
good capture. these guys always seem to be obstructed by branches. it is a little soft but digiscoping doesn't give you a lot of leeway. I'm curious; what is the equivalent focal length and f stop with your digiscope.
Posted by Richard Sogn on November 11, 2007 at 6:24 PM
To catch both of these guys looking at you is terrific. I don't see many owl shots with a pair, or a pair that are so animated. Great shot.
Posted by John Williams on November 11, 2007 at 6:42 PM
Thanks for the comments!

Hans, digiscoping is afocal coupling a camera to a telescope. In my case, this means I use an adapter to connect my Nikon Coolpix 8400 digicam to my Nikon Fieldscope III 60mm ED spotting scope that I use for birdwatching.

Arrgh, the sharpness issue. While digiscoping has some severe limitations (primarily it's light starved with such small diameter lenses), at times it can produce quite sharp pictures. I'm suspicious the softness in this photo is more my eyes and monitor in processing. I still struggle with hitting that sweet spot where a photo looks sharp on most monitors (note that above Hans thought the sharpness was okay, while to both Rick and David it appears soft). See what you think of this redo, on my monitor it looks a tad over sharpened, but I would appreciate feedback.

David, using Jay Turberville's digiscoping calculator, I'm usually shooting at an equivalent focal length of just over 1400mm and an effective f number of 5.54.
Posted by John Williams on November 11, 2007 at 6:45 PM
Oops, the file was too large. Here's the photo.
Posted by Mark Windom on November 11, 2007 at 7:34 PM
The second image does appear to be a little sharper. I like how the guy in the back is peering around his buddy.
Posted by Erik Lundh on November 11, 2007 at 10:26 PM
What a catch. This is a rare shot indeed!!
Posted by Janet Bentley on November 12, 2007 at 12:30 AM
Must have been amazing to see these two. I think that your first image is okay even tho a bit on the soft side. Very nice shot.
Posted by Hans Sager on November 12, 2007 at 2:18 PM
The sharpness looked good on my laptop LCD at home. Now that I look at both images here at work on a CRT, I see the softness in the first image. The second doesn't look oversharpened on the CRT.
Posted by John Williams on November 13, 2007 at 12:58 AM
Thanks for the update. I think I'll routinely sharpen just a bit more for posting on the net than I do for prints, and hope that will hit the sweet spot just a little better.