Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Bewick's Swan (c?)

Discussion

6 replies
Posted by Adrian North on November 13, 2007 at 2:26 PM
Bewick's Swan (c?)
Hi everyone,

I haven't posted an image for some time due to work pressures and broken computer :frown: Well I have fixed the latter at least :razz: and was down at Slimbridge on Saturday. This is one of the images I got that I liked although I have a question about the cropping. Can anyone suggest a better crop for this? Comments are, as always, welcome. The (c?) indicates that I haven't the faintest idea whether this is a captive bird or not - Sorry. :confused: The technical details are:
- Camera: Canon EOS 1D Mk IIN
- Lens: Canon 500mm f4 IS
- Aperture: f5.6 +1/3
- Shutter Speed: 1/1250s
- ISO: 400
- Metering: Evaluative
- Exposure Control: Aperture Priority
- Camera Support: Gitzo 1325 + Wimberley Gimbal
- RAW Conversion: RawShooter Premium
- Post Processing: Levels, Curves, USM
Many thanks for looking,
Adrian
Posted by Mike Smith on November 13, 2007 at 5:17 PM
Refreshing change to Bewicks swimming in the water, - not too sure how you got this low for the angle :wink:

The composition works for me

On whether it is a (c) or not,- my initial reaction is that it is a wild bird - there does not appear to be any leg rings of any description, although on the raised leg it is hard to confirm this, a WWT captive bird would be tagged with at least an aluminium ring.......
Posted by Adrian North on November 13, 2007 at 5:33 PM
Mike,

I dug a hole :biggrin: . Actually I managed to get down lower than the bird because it was sort of on a hump near one of the "lakes". Getting up again proved difficult though and involved several cranes :wink:

Thanks for the comments esp. about the composition.

Adrian
Posted by Andy Astbury on November 14, 2007 at 1:11 AM
Adrian - I do like the comp and pose :toast:

The whites however seem to be low on detail in the highlights - I get the sneaky suspicion that if you converted the CR2 file with the standard Eos software or CapOne instead of that rather notorious 'thing' you use you might find there's more detail to be had in the highlights :wink: :wavey:
Posted by Brian McGeough on November 14, 2007 at 3:36 AM
I like it and guess that it may well be a wild bird too as they are regulars down that way, as Mike has said it's nice to see one out of the wet stuff :wink:
As for the highlights they seem to be ok on my laptop screen, looks spot on here.
Cheers
Brian
Posted by Adrian North on November 14, 2007 at 4:11 AM
Andy and Brian,

Thanks for the comments. Andy I will take a look at the EOS converter - Unfortunately my PC runs Win 2k at the moment (Am trying to spec a new machine :biggrin: ) and can't run the Capture One 4 Beta as the minimum is Win XP. But will get it asap - thanks for the hint

Adrian
Posted by Alan Woolnough on November 14, 2007 at 4:26 AM
The pose and framing hit the spot for me Adrian :toast:

Agree the processing needs some tweaking, but a fine shot!

Alan