Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Not the best goldfinch shot you're likely to see...

Discussion

14 replies
Posted by Mark Fellowes on November 14, 2007 at 9:53 AM
Not the best goldfinch shot you're likely to see...
...but today I don't care!

I bought Paul's Sigma 500, and yesterday he dropped it down to where I work (top man - thanks Paul!). Weather stopped play yesterday, so this morning before work I set up some teasels on top of a niger seed feeder in my garden, popped up a hide and waited for dawn. Rubbish light (who said that a south facing garden was a good thing - obviously not into photography?!), and I know that the BG is poor. But still I'm happy - I finally have some big glass :biggrin:

:toast:

Mark

Nikon D80; ISO 400; slight crop; Sigma 500; 1/125 @ F4.5. PP (quick and dirty) in CS2.
Posted by Tristan Campbell on November 14, 2007 at 10:20 AM
Well this certainly looks good to me - I really like the balance of the composition and poses of the birds. Perhaps just a bit over sharpened. Tristan
Posted by Jeremy on November 14, 2007 at 10:20 AM
Actually, one of the best Goldfinch shots I have seen. Much more interesting than a rather boring portrait of a single bird. To get three birds so nicely arranged in the frame, and all pretty much sharply focused, and all facing towards the camera with hightlights in their eyes, is quite a feat. Only nit is a little more room at the bottom would be ideal. I really like this!
Posted by Alan Woolnough on November 14, 2007 at 11:07 AM
Must agree with the above comments Mark!

Great little 'arrangement' and super result :toast: :toast:

Alan
Posted by John Varley on November 14, 2007 at 11:10 AM
I think this is a very pleasing shot of a feeding party Mark. Yes may be a bit oversharpened in places. I always sharpen on a layer and then partially erase bits which are getting overshapened.

Posted by Edwin kats on November 14, 2007 at 11:30 AM
ÒK, maybe not the best but this is a darn good one. I like the balance in this one and also the natural colours. Well done.

Edwin Kats
Posted by Elliott Neep on November 14, 2007 at 11:52 AM
Mark, quit your whining! Its a good shot!! :biggrin: :wavey: I'd be well happy with this. :toast:
Posted by Paul Everett on November 14, 2007 at 12:35 PM
I think its really good. I like the position of the birds and the plants. The lens is great isnt it? I have one and have really enjoyed using it. As you say the BG could be better but in the circumstances I think you have come away with a great shot.

Paul :toast:
Posted by Graeme Lee on November 14, 2007 at 1:18 PM
Agree slightly oversharpened but a great shot with a difference. Birds on a stick (that's me!) suck! Far more interesting for the viewer with 3 birds! Can't compete :wink:
Posted by Barrie Courtenay on November 14, 2007 at 2:45 PM
Agree with more canvas at the bottom,stil nice image

Posted by Andy Darrington on November 14, 2007 at 2:56 PM
Very nice I like it

Andy
Posted by Marko Trebušak on November 15, 2007 at 1:13 AM
I really don't know what your grumble is all about! Jeremy summed up what I think about your photo. Only thing I would do beside a bit less sharpening would be to try to recover white parts of upper left bird.

Cheers,
Marko
Posted by Andy Astbury on November 15, 2007 at 3:25 AM
Nice capture Mark - I'd be well happy to get 3 together in such a manner, and on teasels too :toast:

Perhaps could be processed a bit better, but it's a super image :wavey:
Posted by Dave Sewell on November 15, 2007 at 5:45 AM
This is terrific! There are certain species that seem really hard to get interesting or dynamic shots of and Goldfinches are up there with the best so this is refreshingly different and nicely composed. I'd be thrilled with this.
Dave
Posted by Mark Fellowes on November 15, 2007 at 12:35 PM
Wow - I'm really taken aback :jump: I thought that it was a nice shot, but that the BG was a problem. Thanks for pointing out the sharpening - I'll have a go at reprocessing it from scratch to see if I can improve it. :biggrin:

Mark