Posted by Jesse Speer on November 25, 2007 at 12:26 PM
Just trying to get some feedback on which image is more appealing ...
Posted by Jesse Speer on November 25, 2007 at 12:26 PM
or this one ...
Posted by Mel Ladewig on November 25, 2007 at 12:33 PM
The second one.
Mel-
Posted by bill meikle on November 25, 2007 at 12:46 PM
I like the tones better in the second one but the rock pillars appear to be leaning to the right, or is it me. I also think the brighter areas are more away from the edges in the second one.
Bill
Posted by Bob Falcone on November 25, 2007 at 12:47 PM
Both are very, very nice, but I'll also go for the second one.
Posted by Todd Caudle on November 25, 2007 at 1:01 PM
Honestly, I couldn't pick between these two. They're equals. I like the better view of gold aspens in the second one, but I like the wider view and slightly more dynamic feel of the first one.
Posted by Art Escobado on November 25, 2007 at 1:11 PM
2
Posted by Joshua Hardin on November 25, 2007 at 1:12 PM
I like how you can see the foreground aspen in #2 as well. Tally another vote for #2.
Posted by Bob Dent on November 25, 2007 at 1:20 PM
I like the top half of the first one and the bottom half of the second one best. I think the split toning is a more effective in the second one. Tough choice, but overall I'd say the second one.
Posted by Bert Fukuda on November 25, 2007 at 1:23 PM
The second one, but both are great!
Posted by Les Barstow on November 25, 2007 at 1:45 PM
I'm with everyone else who's actually chosen between the two - the second one. It lets more of the detail through.
Posted by Brent Doerzman on November 25, 2007 at 1:51 PM
I sure dig them both Jesse, but I think I'll have to go for #1 the most. I just love the mystery of the first one! Killer shots no matter what!
Posted by Don Grall on November 25, 2007 at 2:20 PM
#2 is my favorite if I had to pick just 1, there's more to see, and you still get the low clouds drifting around effect.
Posted by Paul Beiser on November 25, 2007 at 2:54 PM
I like #1 best, because there is something above the peaks on the left..
Posted by Guy Schmickle on November 25, 2007 at 3:42 PM
They're both beautiful, but if you made me choose I'd take the second one as I like the foreground better.
Posted by bill meikle on November 25, 2007 at 3:48 PM
OK I tried not to say any more but I can't stop myself.
First they are both fantastic images. In the first one the brights at the top left are the brightest part of the image and so while they are beautiful they draw the eye and then lead the eye out of the image. I love the bright aspens in the first one and the misty scenes in general. In the second shot the eye dances around the bright areas and never leaves the image. That's my opinion at least for what it's worth.
Now I'll shut up.
Bill
Posted by Dan Walters on November 25, 2007 at 5:03 PM
I like the first one. I like the clouds above the peaks on the left.
Posted by Pam Colander on November 25, 2007 at 5:06 PM
The second...it has a better mix of detail/clouds.
Pam
Posted by Rick Dunn on November 25, 2007 at 6:50 PM
They're both fantastic and equally compelling, but if I were to pick one to hang on my wall, it'd be #1. I think it has a more mystery with the aspen peeking out from the clouds, and, like Paul and Dan, really like the clouds on the left. When you see them next to each other, it's easy to appreciate the extra detail in #2, but without the benefit of that comparison, I think #1 has more emotional impact.
Posted by Jeff Hackett on November 25, 2007 at 8:29 PM
I have to go with #2. The darker sky allows me to focus more on the rock formation and get lost in the forest. In the first one my eye is drawn too much toward the sky in the uper left. Number 2 is the undisputed champion. Excellent image!
Posted by Derek Sedillo on November 25, 2007 at 11:47 PM
Gesh,
I'm conflicted! See what trouble you stirred up.
No seriously great shots. Initially I said #2. But the more I looked at both #1 really stood out as the most compelling. I just feel like it draws me into the scene more with its mysterious pull.
I sure would love to see both side by side enlarged in a frame. My answer might be different then. But I am thinking #1 might stand out all the more with its subtle detail and sublime look.
- Derek
Posted by Gale Rainwater on November 26, 2007 at 1:05 AM
I prefer #2, but they are both excellent. It's your image! It's your artform! You decide which one you like! Edit it the way you want it! And be proud of it!
Posted by John Zinn on November 26, 2007 at 3:09 AM
Jesse, I'd have to go with #2 just because the aspens give a better sense of place. I do really like the wisps of clouds above the Castles in #1.
Posted by Bret Edge on November 26, 2007 at 8:12 AM
I'd keep both of them but my preference is for the 2nd one.
Posted by Cynthia Spence on November 26, 2007 at 10:37 AM
I have to say #1 for me...it's more restful...the second one is great too, but at least on my computer all I can focus on is the dark trees...like Brent says...like the overall mystery of the first one.
Posted by Ed Cooley on November 26, 2007 at 11:09 AM
I prefer #2 due to the additional detail in the trees at the bottom of the frame.
Posted by Dan Gerth on November 26, 2007 at 12:40 PM
I'd have to go with #2. I like the cloud structure better; it's acting like a frame for the left center aspens and the peak on the left. In the first version, I think the clouds are too busy. I'd be pround to have taken either, though.
Posted by Laurent Baig on November 26, 2007 at 1:08 PM
Posted by RODHANNA on November 26, 2007 at 10:22 PM
Number One...more mystery...better tones.
Posted by Michael Renner on November 27, 2007 at 11:57 AM
Boy - that is a tough one. I think I like #1 more because of the mystery of the unseen in the LRC. Both are great. With digital I find I more often have a hard time picking the best of various comps. Almost comes down to a coin flip on some.
With film, I would shoot comp variations much more sparingly...
Posted by Jesse Speer on November 27, 2007 at 4:56 PM
Thank you for the feedback everyone! It helps.
Posted by David A Bliss on December 3, 2007 at 1:28 PM
Tough choice! I really like the mountains in the first shot, especially with the highlighted clouds in the upper left hand corner, but the trees in the second shot are simply stunning! have you thought about combining the two?
If I had to pick one over the other, though, I think it would be #2, simply for the way the trees glow through the clouds.
Discussion
34 repliesMel-
Bill
Guy
First they are both fantastic images. In the first one the brights at the top left are the brightest part of the image and so while they are beautiful they draw the eye and then lead the eye out of the image. I love the bright aspens in the first one and the misty scenes in general. In the second shot the eye dances around the bright areas and never leaves the image. That's my opinion at least for what it's worth.
Now I'll shut up.
Bill
Pam
I'm conflicted! See what trouble you stirred up.
No seriously great shots. Initially I said #2. But the more I looked at both #1 really stood out as the most compelling. I just feel like it draws me into the scene more with its mysterious pull.
I sure would love to see both side by side enlarged in a frame. My answer might be different then. But I am thinking #1 might stand out all the more with its subtle detail and sublime look.
- Derek
With film, I would shoot comp variations much more sparingly...
If I had to pick one over the other, though, I think it would be #2, simply for the way the trees glow through the clouds.