Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Full Moonrise last Friday

Discussion

14 replies
Posted by Tom Kennon on November 25, 2007 at 1:02 PM
Full Moonrise last Friday
All signs pointed to a pretty good full moon on Friday night. Moorise a little after 4:00pm and clear skies. This was not my main objective but when I saw it rising in this field I had to stop and take a few shots. Thanks for looking.
Posted by John Moore on November 25, 2007 at 1:26 PM
Nicely composed Tom, and I think the dark tones at the bottom add to the realism of this shot.
Posted by Tom Kennon on November 25, 2007 at 1:26 PM
Here is a silhouette version. Does the centered moon take away from this shot?
Posted by Gale Rainwater on November 25, 2007 at 2:41 PM
Hey Tom I love the top one very nice. I like the colors in foreground grass, midground hills and colors in the sky. The second one is good but I would like to see all of the trees not just top branches, but love the colors and moon.

:toast:
Posted by Tim Buchanan on November 25, 2007 at 4:13 PM
Hey Tom,

I like both images - on the top one, the composition is very nice, and it gives us a great feel of "night". But there are a few technical glitches (at least they glitches to me!) that might be distracting. For example, there seems to be a slightly dark ring around the moon, and the horizon line looks a little "too" bright right at the trees (in the second photo, this looks more natural).

The second image works for me too - even the centered moon. Though there is a lot of black at the bottom of the frame that could probably be done without.
Posted by Bill Dark on November 25, 2007 at 8:09 PM
Both are nice, Tom, but I really like how the broom sedge color contrasts with the dark trees in the first post. But the technicals that Tim pointed out need a little work. Very nice!
Posted by David Bush on November 25, 2007 at 8:11 PM
Hi Tom I like both photos. In the first I like the placement of the moon, nicely composed. Tim has a couple of good technical points. The second, I like the trees framing the moon. The darker foreground could be trimmed a bit, other wise another nice comp. Nice work!
Posted by Tom Kennon on November 25, 2007 at 9:08 PM
Thanks for the comments and suggestions. This was a blend and my first attempt was using a brush. It did leave a rather harsh edge between the trees and the sky. I also took a shot of the moon to get more detail and blended it. Tim made a couple of good points and I decided to try a couple of other techniques. Here is what I did on this redo.

Rather than use the brush blending method, I used a gradient blend that Mark Johnson from Radient Vista has used several times. I compared this to the original raw file and the colors in the sky match up very well.

On the moon I made a selection on the second attempt and used the refine edge selection in CS3 to smooth the transition. It appears better overall, let me know you thoughts and suggestions.

I really appreciate the suggestions I get on this forum, it really makes me sit back and think of better ways to get what I really saw when I took this shot.

I have also cropped the second shot and made it more of a pano shot. It is right below.
Posted by Tom Kennon on November 25, 2007 at 9:09 PM
Pano version on the second shot.
Posted by David Bush on November 25, 2007 at 9:13 PM
Hey Tom, nice job reworking both images. Now I can't decide which I like best. :smile:
Posted by Wayne Rhodus on November 25, 2007 at 9:24 PM
Hey Tom, I like the reworked images a lot, especially the first one. Very nice!
Posted by Tim Buchanan on November 25, 2007 at 10:49 PM
Oh yes - the reworked images are much, much better!
Posted by Gale Rainwater on November 26, 2007 at 12:27 AM
Tom nice job on their suggestions. I like the crop of the second one much better now.
Hey lets go take some pics together sometime :wink:
Posted by Rob Graham on November 26, 2007 at 8:34 AM
The redone shots are much better, well done. I like the foreground detail in the first.
Posted by Dominic Rossetti on November 26, 2007 at 8:36 AM
Tom, Great job on both images, and the corrections do help. I prefer the first image as it represents closer to what we see, I think. Well done on both.