Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Depth of Field and Focal Length.

Discussion

4 replies
Posted by Justin on November 27, 2007 at 1:00 PM
Following on from a discussion HERE regarding the effects of focal length on depth of field,and so as not to intrude further on Daniel's post.

THIS ARTICLE gives a couple of examples that shows that given a constant subject size (magnification) then the depth of field remains virtually the same no matter what focal length is used.




Justin - either you or I are speaking entirely different languages, or one of us is barking mad.

Subject distance = 10 feet
f number = f16

with a 55 mm lens your total DoF is 7.04 feet

with a 500mm lens it's 0.07 feet

FACT

The differences between 105 and 180 will be a lot smaller but they are there all the same.

Get a DoF calculator if you don't believe me




Andy,

Your example doesn't take into consideration that the subject size is constant.

If you photograph the same subject with a 105mm macro lens and then use a 180mm but obviously moving back slightly so the subect fills the same area of the frame then the depth of field will be virtually the same.
Posted by PhilH on November 27, 2007 at 1:40 PM
Hi...

Justin is right.... if the magnification is the same on the film/sensor it makes not one iota of difference what lens is used the DoF will be almost identical....

(just to quantify I make my living from macro/ high macro photography)

All the best

Phil
Posted by Ian Andrews on November 28, 2007 at 11:34 AM
(just to quantify I make my living from macro/ high macro photography)


You mean they pay you to take those snapshots!! :eek:


:wink:
Ian
Posted by PhilH on November 28, 2007 at 2:32 PM
LoL.... :biggrin: :wavey:
Posted by Graeme Lee on November 28, 2007 at 6:24 PM
I feel a bit giddy reading this Justin :wink: