Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

turnstone + 3 reposts

Discussion

10 replies
Posted by jack chapman on December 16, 2007 at 5:57 PM
turnstone + 3 reposts
taken yesterday morning whilst getting very sandy, especially interested to know whether i have over processed in terms of warmth and saturation

350D + 300mmF4L + 1.4extender
1/2500 @ F5.6
ISO 400
full frame
Posted by Andy Astbury on December 16, 2007 at 8:23 PM
Certainly a nice comp and PoV :toast:

It's definately looking very over processed in contrast at least - if you re-open your original file and use the Shadow/highlight adjust and perhaps a levels adjust layer to set your black and white points I think you'll have a very pleasing image Jack :wavey:
Posted by John Chapman on December 17, 2007 at 5:33 AM
Hi Jack I like this warm lighting picture, considering we hardly see the sun up here in Scotland. :toast:
John
Aberdeen
Posted by John Varley on December 17, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Hi Jack its a pleasing composition and perspective but I agree with Andy's suggestions. :toast:

Posted by jack chapman on December 17, 2007 at 12:15 PM
Hi Andy

just had a quick go at what you said. is this any better?
Posted by Laurie Braman on December 17, 2007 at 1:08 PM
I really like the repost much better! Great photo. I like the low angle and the OOF back and fore ground.

Laurie :wavey:
Posted by PhilH on December 17, 2007 at 1:59 PM
Nice Jack, but I think the PP is still a touch over the top... I assume this is shot RAW? I would initially try for slightly lower contrast, this will give you more 'headroom' in PS... my workflow is to get the image looking as good as I can during the conversion, PP in photoshop is destructive...

Is this a large crop? The bg looks a tad noisy and could do with a bit of reduction.

All the best & speak soon

Phil

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by jack chapman on December 17, 2007 at 2:57 PM
Hi Phil

I can't explain all the noise, it's not cropped at all. Yes it was shot in RAW. I had a go at processing it again like you said. How's this?

Regards

Jack
Posted by PhilH on December 17, 2007 at 3:13 PM
Hi Jack,

Its getting closer....

I hope you don't mind I have done a quick rework of your final repost, I dislike using Shadow/highlight, prefering to get things right from the RAW but here I used a slight amount of shadows and highlights to recover detail in the darker plumage and to bring out just a little more in the lighter plumage, I then applied a bit of NR to the bg and OOF foreground (prob a little too much, but done rather quickly) also quickly removed the couple of highlights in the bg...

Hope this helps....

If you wish I can remove the rework...

All the best

Phil :wavey:
Posted by eric weight on December 18, 2007 at 2:06 AM
I really liked this picture when you first put it on Jack, but I have to say that Phil's take on it stands out. Makes me wonder what I could have done with some of mine now if only I knew what I was doing! :wavey:
Posted by jack chapman on December 18, 2007 at 11:53 AM
Hi Phil
Your repost looks much better thank you, i'll have another go on the RAW to try and get it like that.

Best wishes

Jack