Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

If you could only stock one size print for sale

Discussion

10 replies
Posted by Pete D on January 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM
If you were going to build an inventory of prints for sale, and you wanted to standardize on one size, what would it be?

I'm not asking for your opinion as an artist. I'm asking for your opinion as a business person.

This is not custom work it's for "bin work" at an art show.

Pete D.
Posted by Mark Windom on January 28, 2008 at 6:38 PM
16X20. Should be able to price it at a point where it is worth it (profitable) for you and affordable to the serious buyer.
Posted by Tony Litschewski on January 29, 2008 at 8:56 AM
11x14 matted to 16x20 will be your best selling size.
Posted by Hank Pennington on January 29, 2008 at 11:14 AM
Perhaps because we're often dealing with folks who are traveling, 8x10's sell better numerically than the larger sizes. That's in light of the need to mail them after purchase, or worse yet, stuff them in a suitcase for pawing by TSA staff at airports. In light of that, we charge a fairly steep price for our 8x10's. The size certainly reflects the distinction between our relatively small local population compared to the # of travelers.

I agree with the others that larger sizes are better sellers for locals. 8x10's languish in bins in the "off" season without tourons. We no longer sell premats, but 16x20 seems to be some kind of magic overall dimension. When we were matting them 11x14's matted to 16x20 sold better, but once we quit matting 16x20's moved to the front of sales.
Posted by Pete D on January 29, 2008 at 3:40 PM
That's interesting. 16x20 is somewhat larger than I would have guessed. Thanks for the input.

Pete D.
Posted by Don George on January 29, 2008 at 4:40 PM
We sell more 11x14 matted to 16x20 in a matted format. Our best seller framed is 20x30 matted to 26x30.
Posted by Erik Stensland on January 29, 2008 at 6:31 PM
I'll echo what others have to say. I have a gallery in Estes Park, CO and the best selling format by far are prints matted to 16x20. They outsell the others by 2 to 1.
Posted by Dan Borzynski on February 4, 2008 at 11:06 PM
Interesting. By far, my best selling size is 8x10 matted to 11x14. It outsells 11x14 matted to 16x20 by around 3:1. About every other show, I'll sell a 16x20 matted to 22x28.

Posted by Steve Foss on February 5, 2008 at 9:03 AM
My experiences echo Dan's and Hank's to some degree, while I have sold some prints up to 20x30. I've only been offering prints for about three years, and have one permanent show and a couple yearly shows, as well as online sales.

My 8x10s matted to 11x14, whether framed or matted/mounted and ready for framing, easily do the best sales-wise.
Posted by Hank Pennington on February 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Hey Pete,

One thing hasn't come up yet, which we feel is important. Your display at fairs and such will have much more impact and draw the most interest if you hang display prints that are as large as possible. We don't plan on selling them, but are happy to do so when the rare sale occurs. But they do increase sales of everything else.

There's an adage in studios and galleries which we've confirmed repeatedly and thoroughly: The biggest print you will sell is one size smaller than the largest you have displayed. I.e., larger display prints "drag up" the size of your other print sales. It really, really works for us. I keep wondering if we displayed one size larger than 30x40, would we sell more 30x40's? Kinda academic, because we don't have room for more and larger displays. In the current economy, I don't think I would want to build or buy a larger studio, much less add onto the one we own now. A paid-off mortgage is a beautiful thing! :toast:
Posted by Catherine Reilly on March 25, 2008 at 4:04 AM
Very informative. Thanks for the advice, everyone.