Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Backpack or "utility" belt

Discussion

17 replies
Posted by Bert Fukuda on March 26, 2008 at 11:02 PM
Ever since I started photography, I've always been a backpack guy. However, as I age my body has started to wear down from all beating I put on it growing up. Anyway, I've been reading about the ThinkTank Speed Belt system and so far what I've read has been favorable. I wanted to try it out before buying it but doesn't look like anywhere close carries them. So I wanted to see if anyone in the forum uses this type of system and if so, maybe get some pros and cons on it.
I'd really appreciate any feedback I can get.

Thanks,
Bert
Posted by Todd Caudle on March 26, 2008 at 11:28 PM
A utility belt always worked for Batman.
Posted by Bert Fukuda on March 26, 2008 at 11:36 PM
True, very true. However, I'm more along the lines of a Kato (Green Hornets side-kick for the younger generation :)
Posted by Derek Sedillo on March 26, 2008 at 11:45 PM
Burt, I just went thru this same thought process and research myself. I was looking at everything from the latest hybrid camera backpacks, to improved hiking backpacks, to belt systems from thinktank and lowepro. I read many threads on the topic, especially regarding the belts since not many people I know use them exclusively. I did so much reading and heard so many various combinations that it became clear that there is no 'one' single best solution, but rather 'many' good options out there right now.

In the end I opted for an lighter weight hiking backpack for the superior suspension, balance and better overall feel. I purchased a Deuter 45+10L which has side & top access to the main compartment. I already have some smaller lowepro 'camera' bags that can fit inside. I am also planning to check out the toploaders by thinktank and lowepro which can be worn in front. Some even attach the frontloader to the front their backpack to balance the load. This also allows for easy access. Then I can just put the other lenses in the backpack.

Here is a thread I started on this topic in the PNWNP forum since I am planning on using it a lot on our trip out there this May:
http://www.naturephotographers.net/imagecritique/bbs.cgi?a=vm&mr=27688&CGISESSID=c8be26410790f685608aed9c76c85deb&u=23079
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on March 26, 2008 at 11:55 PM
I've been using the ThinkTank Belt over the last six months. It hasn't replaced my photo backpack, but it's great to have when you can go light.

I find it best for wildlife, when I'm primarily using a 500mm + tripod. ThinkTank has a quick-open pouch designed specifically for dropping in TCs - beats the heck out of having to get into a pack.

When there are opportunities for macro or landscape, I add a few extra lens pouches, but I don't load up the belt - my objective is to just take the minimum gear needed. If I want to haul more, then I still prefer the good-ole pack.

If you're in the Denver area, you are welcome to try out what I have. BUT, I won't get back until July. (If you find yourself in Houston between now and July, drop by and we can shoot some birds :wavey: )
Posted by Bert Fukuda on March 27, 2008 at 12:07 AM
Derek ~ That's a ton of information especially in the other thread. I probably hike as much as you do and don't have any kids so I only need to carry my stuff. I'm looking for something that's quicker and easier to manage than a backpack. I like backpacks but hate having to put them down to change lenses etc.

Bill ~ I appreciate the offer but will probably decide to buy or not before July. However, in the event I'm still undecided I would be happy to accept you offer.

Thanks,
Bert
Posted by Derek Sedillo on March 27, 2008 at 12:10 AM
Bill,

Do you use ThinkTank's Digital Holsters? I am thinking about getting the DH30 which fits my longest lens with the hood extended. It can be worn in front like the lowepro toploaders. But it requires an additional belt for this - The Digital Holster Harness. Here is a picture of it: http://www.thinktankphoto.com/ttp_product_DgtlHlstr.php
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on March 27, 2008 at 12:49 AM
Derek, no I don't use their holster. They don't make one yet for a body w/500 mm attached. :biggrin:

ThinkTank sure keeps busy adding more options! As you mentioned, there isn't any 'one' best system, but their modular approach sure provides a lot of options as your "needs" change.
Posted by Derek Sedillo on March 27, 2008 at 12:55 AM
Burt,

I know what you mean about ease of access. That is why I like the toploaders. Slings are also nice like the Kata T-214: http://www.kata-bags.com/Item.asp?pid=324&cid=58&perentId=4&ProdLine=4

The thing is if you like hiking whether you use a belt or a sling you also have to have something to carry your 'other' gear as well like rain jacket, food, water, etc... And in Colorado that can also mean snow shoes and some survival gear depending on the conditions.
Posted by Derek Sedillo on March 27, 2008 at 12:59 AM
Bill,

I can imagine that would be a pretty loooong holster hanging down if they did offer it. It might making walking around a bit difficult though. And I'm sure it would elicit some interesting looks. :biggrin: :jump:
Posted by Ken Wyatt on March 27, 2008 at 1:24 AM
Hi Bert,

I also prefer carrying gear on my hips. But as others have stated, there are purposes for each type of equipment carrying system. I have all three major types - backpack (several of which I seldom use any more), modular belt system (a LowePro, which I use for sports photography or minimal shooting) and a vest (Vested Interest) with pocket in back for a 500/4, along with a variety of other pockets around the front. This one I use when shooting for extended times in the field, as it has room for lunch, water, survival stuff, etc.

Ken
Posted by Scott Bacon on March 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Keep in mind that the larger pouches on a belt can interfere with arm swing while hiking. Personally, this drives me crazy. If you use hiking poles, this is relatively a non-issue.

Anyone who knows me, knows I'm a bag-a-holic and I've tried many, many, many backpacks. Usually, I get frustrated with lack of comfort, or ease of access, etc., etc. and I end up selling them on eBay and trying something new. But I've been quite happy with my latest trial - the Lowepro Primus. It is on the small side for capacity (fine for most landscapers), but it is very comfortable and feature-rich. The quick side access panel is very cool.

But just like everything else with camera gear, it's a personal thing and you'll have to figure out what works best for you... :smile:
Posted by Matthew Kennedy on March 27, 2008 at 11:04 AM
A utility belt always worked for Batman.


Batman was a scientist...

I use a Slingshot 200 as my walking around bag. It holds all the necessary lenses for just about every situation I encounter on vacation or just walking around and I love the access. For going out on dedicated shoots though, I still use a big dedicated backpack to hold all my crap.
Posted by Jay Ryser on March 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM
I'm using a variety of things and not really satisfied with ANY of them.

I like my ThinkTank Digital Holster 50, but only use it on level trails - otherwise I couldn't see my feet and don't want my body mass landing on top of my kit in a fall.

My Lowepro Slingshot 200 is great for a small kit and short lenses, but not for big lenses.

I have the Lowpro vest & belt, and overall I like it, but it's not a way to carry a big lens & camera at the ready.

I just got a Lowepro Flipside 300 that seems promising, but it's certainly not easy access.

My best solution so far is to turn my teenage son into my photography Sherpa. He grumbles and complains, but not any more than he does about anything else, and it frees me up to watch for photo opps.

:jump:
Posted by Ken Wyatt on March 27, 2008 at 6:57 PM
I like my ThinkTank Digital Holster 50, but only use it on level trails - otherwise I couldn't see my feet and don't want my body mass landing on top of my kit in a fall.


You're supposed to twist around quickly as you fall so that your body cushions the equipment!

Ken
Posted by Jay Ryser on March 27, 2008 at 7:24 PM
Body to cushion the equipment, eh?
Posted by Derek Sedillo on March 27, 2008 at 8:11 PM
Ken, the mental image of that kind of a twisting sacrificial fall is too funny! :jump: :eek:
So tell me, if you have the 500L on your back and and your other gear on your vest in front how might you twist and fall? :biggrin:

Posted by Bert Fukuda on March 29, 2008 at 12:28 AM
I want to thank everyone who responded. I'll let you know what I finally decided and what I thought about my pick.

Thanks,
Bert