Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Less than 3 megapixel weekly challenge

Discussion

5 replies
Posted by Danny on April 19, 2008 at 3:48 AM
So, a few of you folks must still have an old camera or two around. Charlie has a great theme this week in the Weekly Challenge forum. Carol of course is running it fine as usual. Would love to see what a few of the avian shooters have from the golden age before 3 megapixel cameras. Landscape, man and nature shooters and wheres all those macro shooters that took shots with less than 3 megapixel. I know who you are :wink: Don't forget to mention the post processing you used for the shot.

All the best folks and we are hoping to see a few old shots from the archives before you all got rich and got into DSLR's :smile: :cool:

Danny.
Posted by Carol Hyman on April 19, 2008 at 11:08 AM
Danny, You're too funny :jump:

I imagine that those cameras have long been given away. So funny because the early cameras were not inexpensive. If I look back to 2000 when I purchased my 990, the camera and a telephoto lens were about 1200 bucks--give or take.

I'm rather thinking about resurrecting mine to do some close up work :wink:

Carol
Posted by Danny on April 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM
Memory time :rolleyes: :wink: I spotted the 1.9 (2.1) megapixel CD-1000 at the time Carol, aww thats nice, gotta have that with the long zoom. Cost was $2,500 NZ, about $1,800 US at the time. Oh boy how do I justify this thing. Well it did that by itself, so never looked back really. The cost at the time though, just seemed very daunting to say the least :wink:

Before that was a Sony FD91 ($1,800 NZ) that used floppy disks :smile: . I'll post one up from that next.

All the best Carol, ahhh memories.

Danny.
Posted by Bruce Palla on April 21, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Do film images count? I shot a Canon AE up until 1 1/2 years ago, and jumped to a Nikon D200. I had my processing done at labs or Walgreens which supplied me a disk of images. I made the jump to a DSLR due to free lance work at a local paper shooting high school sports. The cost was reasonable after shooting a NASCAR race w/ film and over 6 rolls of bad images had to be paid for! I love the magic "X" of digital (delete). Bruce
Posted by Basil Greber on April 21, 2008 at 6:24 PM
Seems like I'm too young for that challenge. The first digital camera I've ever touched already had 5 MP...

Basil
Posted by Jim Salge on April 22, 2008 at 2:02 PM
For those who 'don't have a camera' with less than 3 mp...I would look no further than your cell phone for this challenge. I've taken some mighty fine shots with my 1.2 MP phone cam!