Broke down and bought one. I must say it lives up to its reputation....a zoom comparable to primes. I don't have the 1.4 aperature...but it does have amazing sharpness. When I apply sharpening, it is almost like I went from 12MP to 16MP and should help with my enlargments. Now to sell that 17-55.
Seems like everyone is hunting for this lens...but as karma would have it, they had one over at Pro Photo Supply.
Went to the Japanese Gardens and really put it though its paces on a familiar subject (chose familiar as I wanted to see the diffrence on finely detailed subjects I know how the old lens reacts to)
Now...for that pesky 14-24 and the D4X (when it comes)
Did you ever have a 28-70, 2.8? I have one, I like it, it's really sharp but I'm wondering if the 24-70 is that much better that I should replace it when the D4x comes out?
Thanks everyone. I have a few trusted contacts that have Zeiss Primes....they tell me the output is rather similar. If they are correct....(and I dont have any reason to doubt them) this should put things in perspective. My hunch it is between the two....but thats pretty insane territory for a zoome lens.
As for the 17-55, my asking price is $1,050 + shipping.
Discussion
12 repliesSeems like everyone is hunting for this lens...but as karma would have it, they had one over at Pro Photo Supply.
Went to the Japanese Gardens and really put it though its paces on a familiar subject (chose familiar as I wanted to see the diffrence on finely detailed subjects I know how the old lens reacts to)
Now...for that pesky 14-24 and the D4X (when it comes)
Roman
Did you ever have a 28-70, 2.8? I have one, I like it, it's really sharp but I'm wondering if the 24-70 is that much better that I should replace it when the D4x comes out?
JG
That will leave me with the quandary of the 12-24 or the 17-35 also.
I have a 28-70 and it is incredibly sharp, so the 24-70 must be really nice
As for the 17-55, my asking price is $1,050 + shipping.
Roman
LOL>..you need the D300 now.
Roman