EQUIPMENT & TOOLS:
Nikon D2x
12-24mm @ 12mm
f/14 @ .5 sec
Remote release,
Worlds second most expensive tripod
Worlds most expensive ballhead
Photographer Vest,
Photoshop, (a little bit o' burning and dodging),
4:57AM,
Tecnu (anti poison oak soap),
Marc Adamus' Super Duper Wammer Jammer Web sharpening technique,
Just a hair bit of Ability and Desire (don't really need a lot of Ability and Desire since I have such good gear).
Thanks, it turned out darker here on the web than it is at home on in print.
Posted by Adrian Klein on May 19, 2008 at 11:08 PM
I really like this Mark. I admit much more so than than your last post. The three elements (lupine, balsam, oak) are composed nicley. I agree about the back being slightly lighter but that has been addressed I see.
Posted by Darren White on May 19, 2008 at 11:15 PM
Nice...the yellows are a bit bright....and I can never get the tree trunks to look any other color than that purple from the Lupine.....
Darren, this oak was a bit purple. I added a Hue & Saturation layer and sucked out the blue and cyan to make the tree gray. Then I painted with black on the mask on everything but the tree to reveal the rest of the photo before the layer adjustments.
There are a couple of real bright flower, I need to darken them.
This is really good Mark. I prefer the original; the darker background sets off the stronger points of the photo nicely and the bright balsamroot really provides a focal point. I'd be tempted to play with vignetting the bottom two corners just a bit to set off the balsamroot even more. As noted above, the curve of the balsamroot/lupine around the tree is a really strong composition. I'm not sure about the tallest grass mixed in with the balsamroot. I might have been tempted to shoot this, and the "groom" it a little for a second shot to compare.
John, I thought of that but I always end up doing too much gardening and the scene ends up looking less natural to me. In the print, the grasses are a wonderful detail to explore.
Kevin, of course it does? Don't you know that you have to have expensive gear to take good photos?
Discussion
11 repliesNikon D2x
12-24mm @ 12mm
f/14 @ .5 sec
Remote release,
Worlds second most expensive tripod
Worlds most expensive ballhead
Photographer Vest,
Photoshop, (a little bit o' burning and dodging),
4:57AM,
Tecnu (anti poison oak soap),
Marc Adamus' Super Duper Wammer Jammer Web sharpening technique,
Just a hair bit of Ability and Desire (don't really need a lot of Ability and Desire since I have such good gear).
I think this works quite well compositionally. I'd like to see the background a bit lighter.
here is a lighter version.
Darren, this oak was a bit purple. I added a Hue & Saturation layer and sucked out the blue and cyan to make the tree gray. Then I painted with black on the mask on everything but the tree to reveal the rest of the photo before the layer adjustments.
There are a couple of real bright flower, I need to darken them.
Kevin
BTW, I have the world's cheepest tripod ($70 at ProPhoto). Does that make my pictures crappy?
Kevin
John, I thought of that but I always end up doing too much gardening and the scene ends up looking less natural to me. In the print, the grasses are a wonderful detail to explore.
Kevin, of course it does? Don't you know that you have to have expensive gear to take good photos?