Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Nidderdale Pano + REPOST

Discussion

19 replies
Posted by Tristan Campbell on June 9, 2008 at 7:23 PM
Taken this evening, this is my first ever attempt at stitching a couple of frames together to make a panorama. It was quite a sunset, though I do wonder if the sky is perhaps distracting in places. Any thoughts?

1.3 seconds, f/14, 5D, 36mm, 3 stop ND
Posted by Ian Macdermott on June 9, 2008 at 7:35 PM
Looks fine to me Tristan I would have been happy to obtain such a good result on the first go :toast:



Ian
Posted by Tom_W on June 10, 2008 at 1:35 AM
I like it. My only issue would be the competition between the rock and the sky for both compete for the main subject of the image. I would have been tempted to have simply removed the rock and concentrated on the sky in this instance. Simplicity.
Posted by Nigel Blake on June 10, 2008 at 2:01 AM
I really like this, I don't have a problem with the "competition" between sky and rock and the shot looks great.
However I feel the image would work better if the shooting position had been several paces left (or right) thus placing the rock to one side in the composition so rather than intruding into, it helped frame, the dusk sky; but I dare say you covered several different compositions of this fine scene.
Posted by Tim Taylor on June 10, 2008 at 2:06 AM
I think I agree with Tom in that 2 great subjects are competing in this composition. However, it might look great as a big print instead of a 720px wide web shot.

Tim :toast:
Posted by Alan Woolnough on June 10, 2008 at 3:23 AM
Looks like a seamless job to my eye Tristan, and a beautiful pano to boot.

I think my traditional eye would also feel more comfortable with the rock being placed further to one side, in this instance.

:toast: :toast:

Alan
Posted by Andy Astbury on June 10, 2008 at 3:41 AM
The big version looks glorious to me Tristan with just enough light to show the subtle details in the central feature :toast:
Posted by Tristan Campbell on June 10, 2008 at 4:35 AM
Thanks for the thoughts on this one. Looking this morning I can see this clearly isnt right as I suspected last night. I got a bit carried away stitching photos together as it was something new and didnt look at the other shots. I think this is a better sky and composition. Thanks for the input. Tristan
Posted by David Clapp on June 10, 2008 at 4:43 AM
I like them both very much, each has its merits. I wouldnt of minded one without the mushroom in at all as it is quite foreboding in this high contrast light. The stitching worked very well, its amazing how much web resizing reduces tonal depth isnt it, because your big images have so much more shadow detail.

What lens and software did you use? Its worked very well. The whole effect on both images is very painterly. Thinking about where to place objects in the frame when shooting panoramas is somewhat confusing at first isnt it.
Posted by Tristan Campbell on June 10, 2008 at 4:48 AM
Thanks Dave. I just stuck them together on layers and used a layer mask to merge them together. The lens is the 17-40. The second image is a single shot at 17mm. Is it better to use something more like a 50 to 70mm lens for stitching to get a flatter perspective?

The pano idea was a last minute thought and it's made me want to look into doing more of them. Stupidly I didnt take any without the mushroom ... next time.
Posted by Nigel Blake on June 10, 2008 at 4:57 AM
Magnificent sky on the second shot, excellent image!
Posted by Matt Cole on June 10, 2008 at 6:04 AM
they're both very attractive images, the sky is superb. I think I prefer the mushroom off-centre and would also have liked to have seen an image without the mushroom.

Matt
Posted by Danny Green on June 10, 2008 at 6:27 AM
Great shots I like them both but the second one is something else.

Danny

:toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Tim Taylor on June 10, 2008 at 6:43 AM
To me the second shot is much more harmonious with the clouds top right guiding the eye to the 'mushroom' and then beyond.

Tim :toast:
Posted by Elliott Neep on June 10, 2008 at 7:43 AM
The second shot really wins for me. The simplistic composition and clarity are amazing. The colours are gorgeous. My issue was more a lack of detail in the foreground of the first shot. It wasn't quite light enough, yet not dark enough for a silhouette and the mushroom is also quite intrusive so not sure whether the rock or the sky is the main focus. :toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Paul Inglis on June 10, 2008 at 8:04 AM
Hi Tristan,

Both images are awesome and I'd love either one on my files! That said! You have two very distinct images here! I prefer the composition with the rock off-centre and love the skies in both images!
:toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Adrian North on June 10, 2008 at 9:14 AM
Tristan,

Err can I have both images on my wall please? :biggrin:

They are both awesome but I think the second image just shades it a bit. Thanks for sharing

Adrian
Posted by Dave Courtenay on June 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Skies like that dont come along everyday-love the 2nd one,Truly beautiful and must look fantastic printed large

Dave :toast:
Posted by Michael Sayles on June 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM
Definitely the second one for me - very fine! I personally feel it needs the 'mushroom' - without it, it's "just another sunset shot".
Posted by Justin on June 14, 2008 at 5:14 PM
Both very nice shots but I especially like the repost with that stunning sky and the way the cloud formations point towards the stone structure.

:toast: :cool: