Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Tawny Owl (c)

Discussion

19 replies
Posted by Edwin kats on June 11, 2008 at 5:22 PM
Tawny Owl (c)
To be truly honest I had some serious doubts posting a captive animal on UKNP. Don't know why exactly but I did.
I had a great time with Danny and Vincent at the Barn owl center. Some great set ups and wonderful birds. I was truly amazed by the perfect conditions of the birds and the new center looks absolutely wonderful and professional.
I really want to thank Vince and Danny for their hospitality and for being good company. I learned a lot from that day. It was worth every minute.

iso 200 1/250 sec. F5 Sigma 120-300/2.8

Edwin Kats
Posted by Andy Astbury on June 11, 2008 at 5:41 PM
It's a lovely image Ed as I said when I saw it on your cam screen - and remember this matey, your average picture buyer won't really care one way or the other if it's a cap bird or not.

And to top it off you'd never guess it was captive as the set is so natural.

Vince's bird is in superb feather and Dan did you proud - I like it a lot matey :toast:

All the best on the Browns next week :wavey: :wavey:
Posted by Daniel Read on June 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM
It's a really fantastic photo, great setting, pose and lighting. I've no problem with captive animal shots, but having said that, it would be even more special if it was a wild bird, if you know what I mean?

Cheers,

Dan.
Posted by Ian Mason on June 11, 2008 at 5:57 PM
Captive or wild, it's hugely impressive and I can see this on some card for sale in the high street. Maybe the perch is just a little busy though.
Posted by Ian Macdermott on June 11, 2008 at 6:16 PM
If you had not stated it was captive no one would have known. Its still an excellent picture only nit is the ragweed ? making it a bit busy.

Nice one.

Ian
Posted by John Robinson on June 11, 2008 at 6:38 PM
Definately would be better without the foliage.
As Andy says ,picture buyers don't care if its captive
JohnR
Posted by eric weight on June 12, 2008 at 12:29 AM
I have to differ here. The foliage absolutely makes this shot for me and without it, it would be 'just' another tawny owl picture albeit expertly executed. Captive or not the image is still beautiful to look at.
:toast: Eric
Posted by stewart canham on June 12, 2008 at 2:57 AM
Having done a captive shoot a few years ago and thoroughly enjoyed the day, I would judge the image, as an image, the fact that it is a captive bird IMHO is imaterial.The image is first class,and you must be very pleased with your efforts,and when you eventually bump into a wild bird hopfully you will know just what to do.....
Stewart.......................... :wavey:
Posted by Tim Munsey on June 12, 2008 at 3:40 AM
Well presented, the choreography is excellent, love the way its framed by various parts of the picture - the dark OOF top, the cow parsley.

Tim
Posted by PhilH on June 12, 2008 at 4:16 AM
A very nice image Edwin, though I would prefer it with the Cow Parsley either lower in the frame or not at all, at the moment it does look like it was placed there and I feel it would have made a better prop just in the lower 1/4 to 1/3 of the frame.

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by Dawn Monrose on June 12, 2008 at 5:14 AM
A stunning shot! For me, the cow parsley really makes it, it echos the detail in the feathers, and makes it look really natural. If you hadn't said, I would have thought this would be a wild shot. As mentioned, buyers probably won't care either way. I think thats the important thing about captive shots, to make it look wild. That way, you're not giving any false information to the viewer.

Brilliant! :toast: :toast:
Posted by Paul Hillion on June 12, 2008 at 5:22 AM
Wonderful shot, no nits from me at all! imo the foliage just adds to the shot.

:toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Paul Gibbs on June 12, 2008 at 5:55 AM
Really nice, i dont mind the foliage, i also dont mind it being a captive bird, as long as its being kept happy and well.

Which knowing Vincent it certainly would be. Nice shot Edwin.
Posted by Barrie Harwood on June 12, 2008 at 10:17 AM
Love everything about it (am I allowed to say that now :wink:)
Posted by Alan Woolnough on June 12, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Its a super image Edwin,

A well crafted captive shot is a completely different ball game to Aunty Mables snap shots, and a tricky subject if it is to stand up to scrutiny IMO.

Although not really my 'thing', i can appreciate this excellent shot :toast: :toast:

Alan
Posted by Mark Green on June 12, 2008 at 10:57 AM
i agree the follage makes it for me too. super image,
:toast:
Mark
Posted by Vincent Jones on June 12, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Captive or not Edwin, it's a corker of a shot. I too had a great day with you & Danny & his son.

For me & the Owls here, it was a real pleasure :toast: :toast: :toast:
Posted by Robert Lawrence on June 12, 2008 at 5:44 PM
I like it as is and agree that captive or wild makes no difference to the final image. At least you have the honesty to state it is captive which cannot be said of some other photographers.
Robert
Posted by Edwin kats on June 12, 2008 at 5:50 PM
Thanks everyone :wavey:

Edwin Kats
Posted by Alan Bryant on June 13, 2008 at 11:18 AM
Love everything about this image :toast: :toast: