Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Spring Forest

Discussion

21 replies
Posted by Jesse Speer on June 17, 2008 at 2:27 PM
Spring Forest
Here's my latest panning blur image, a detail of an aspen forest at sunset made this last weekend. This is a truly magical spot, due to the layering and color available in the undergrowth. It seems to work well for this type of impressionistic photograph. Your thoughts?

Unlike some of my others posted, the effect was created completely in-camera.

Details: 1dsIII, 100-400mm at 260mm, f/40, 2 seconds.
(For once, diffraction is a plus!)
Posted by Dan Walters on June 17, 2008 at 2:38 PM
I really like the pastel colors. Your blur technique has produced some beautiful images.
Posted by Bret Edge on June 17, 2008 at 2:57 PM
This is superb, Jesse. Absolutely gorgeous. Would love to know more about this technique.
Posted by Derek Sedillo on June 17, 2008 at 3:13 PM
Awesome Jesse! Another beauty. I think you are really refining this panning technique process. I also think I like this one the most so far. Although the panning abstracts you created in PS were really nice as well. Keep up the good work! :biggrin:
Posted by Jesse Speer on June 17, 2008 at 3:17 PM
Thanks guys.

Bret, this stuff is a lot of fun - and the technique has been around for about a century or so (that I know of). Long exposure + jiggle the camera = images like what you see here. That's a simple way to put it. The image above involved simple up/down movement during exposure. I'm finding this technique much more appealing/rewarding than computer manipulation.

William Neill recently wrote an article about the technique for OP. It's worth a read ...
http://www.williamneill.com/
Posted by Jeremy Week on June 17, 2008 at 3:20 PM
I love this! The only thing I'd like more is to see it in a large print!!
Posted by Tony Litschewski on June 17, 2008 at 3:35 PM
Jesse, just curious, do you also have a "steady" shot of this so we can see the difference?

Very eye catching and unique image!
Posted by Dave Showalter` on June 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM
This is the best I've seen using the motion technique ~ helped a great deal by soft light and beautiful greens on the forest carpet. Magic!
Posted by Nat Coalson on June 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM
Hey Jesse - this is really a gorgeous image and a great example of the technique. And thanks for posting the link to Bill Neill's article; he's done lots of this kind of work.

I agree with you that this is much more fun than computer manipulation! The spontaneity produces unexpected results, some of which would be *very difficult* to create any other way.

And not to hijack your thread :biggrin: , but for anyone who wants to see more examples of this technique, I have several collections on my site, too:

http://nathanielcoalson.com/photographs/imp_nature_2/
http://nathanielcoalson.com/photographs/impressionistic_nature/
Posted by Neil Corman on June 17, 2008 at 5:45 PM
Great image Jesse. Finding the right light and contrast between trees and undergrowth is important in an image like this and you found a great spot to grab this image. Congrats!
Posted by Jesse Speer on June 17, 2008 at 6:01 PM
Tony, I don't have a steady shot of this comp, but here's something close - in different light, several feet away and at a different focal length. It's easy enough to pick out the similar elements.

These are both shot from my car window, hand-held. Why? 20 yards off to my right in a gully, a bear was tearing up a downed log. No tripod shooting for me on this evening.

Hijacking is what community forums are for Nat, IMO. Excellent portfolio! I hadn't seen those before - and haven't viewed your website in awhile. Now I'm even more inspired.
Posted by Bill Pelzmann on June 17, 2008 at 6:36 PM
Dang! I love that diffraction at f/40 !
Great work - keeps getting better. :toast:
Posted by Rick Dunn on June 17, 2008 at 6:46 PM
You're on to something with this technique, Jesse. This one is absolutely gorgeous. I'd think that interior designers would be very interested in this type of work, and it's very easy to imagine a few of these being hung side by side in a large display. Seems easier to create a harmonious display of multiple images with these types of impressionistic techniques as opposed to the more "realistic" presentation of a traditional photograph.
Posted by Paul Wegemann on June 17, 2008 at 8:03 PM
Beautiful work, Jesse. Thanks for sharing how you did it.
Posted by Bill Speaks on June 17, 2008 at 9:03 PM
Michael Orton has a great book showing various techniques. It was written before digital photography, but the techniques are still applicable.

http://www.librarything.com/work/1654618/book/28928503

Bill

www.speaksimages.com
Posted by Nat Coalson on June 17, 2008 at 9:53 PM
Bill - great point... for a while this was called the Orton Technique! He used slide sandwiches.

Tony Sweet also has some good film work of this kind, though with digital the "blur" aspect is more pronounced than is the "step" effect.
Posted by Scott Bacon on June 17, 2008 at 10:27 PM
That's incredibly beautiful - ethereal. Nice work!
Posted by Roger Rouch on June 17, 2008 at 10:58 PM
Wow, very easy on the eyes, Jesse! Would be interesting to see this as a large print.
Posted by Harold Ankney on June 17, 2008 at 11:59 PM
A beautiful image jesse. The pastel colors and the effects of the motion really is fantastic. By the way, did you get any shots of the bear?

Harold
Posted by Stan Rose on June 18, 2008 at 7:24 PM
Im not a huge fan of blur, although i thought some of your earlier posts were really nice. This one doesnt really register with me as well. I like the unusual depth it creates, and the ghost-forest look is somewhat intriguing. I think the problem i have with this particular shot is that it doesnt really look like Aspen to me, it looks like blurred white lines. Seems like im in the minority...carry on!
Posted by Momo Vuyisich on June 19, 2008 at 2:06 AM
This is a fantastic painting-like photograph. Since you gave away the technique, I'll be definitely tempted to try it out sooner or later. Thank you for sharing. :smile:
Posted by Jesse Speer on June 19, 2008 at 4:44 PM
Harold, I did get a shot of the bear, but I haven't processed it yet. Nothing special ... just an "I saw it" shot. I was in f/40 mindset, with polarizer.

Thank you for commenting everyone. These types of image can be very personal, and don't work for everyone.