Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Atlantic Puffin

Discussion

10 replies
Posted by Dave Tucker on July 14, 2008 at 10:58 AM
Atlantic Puffin
Hi Following advice I have re-sized the image and used a "side head shot" please tell me what you think:

Hi
Spent the day on the Farne Islands, UK.

Nikon D200
Sigma 500mm f/4.5
Nikon SB 800 for "fill flash"
ISO 400
Matrix Metering
Dynamic Focus
Mode "M"
Raw

Would be grateful for comments/advice

Dave
Posted by Paul Gibbs on July 14, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Nice, my only nits would be the oof puffin in the bg interfering with the shape of the subject. Also it seems a little under exposed?
Posted by Dave Tucker on July 14, 2008 at 11:18 AM
Hi Paul, Agree, having a problem, in Lightroom, the image is bright, on uploading appears under exposed. Have just uploaded the same image in "avian" section, I think it is slightly better.
Dave
Posted by Rob Howard on July 14, 2008 at 1:19 PM
Hi Dave,

Hope you don't mind but tried to lift the image a little. Gently moved the level sliders and given curves a gentle "s", a touch more exposure (although whites are getting hot) + 15 on saturation and 5 rounds of USM at rates 100,0.2,0.

HTH

Regards

Rob
Posted by Dave Tucker on July 14, 2008 at 4:56 PM
Hi Rob
Thanks for your input, looks better, however when I export from Lightroom the image is bright and crisp, however once exported the image often appears under exposed.....I am on the case, and will work it out, as it is driving me nuts!!!!!

Dave
Posted by Barry Southon on July 14, 2008 at 5:06 PM
Dave

I'm impressed with Rob's adjustment I too am having all sorts of problems with lightroom with images looking fine until I export and then they go to rats. So much so I've just downloaded Bibble Pro. I think I expect instant results.

Barry :wink:

Kansas / Eastbourne
Posted by Nicholas Armitt on July 14, 2008 at 5:49 PM
I don't use lightroom but are you exporting the images as SRGB for uploading?
Posted by Dave Tucker on July 15, 2008 at 1:23 AM
Hi Nick, I am using SRGB, although not sure why? Is it better than RGB?

Dave
Posted by PhilH on July 15, 2008 at 4:56 AM
Like the idea... the flash seems to be not having any effect here, one would expect at least the eye to pick up a catchlight from it... that is the main crit here, the eye needs a catchlight to give it some life/

The image has been uploaded as untagged, it needs converting to sRGB which is the better colour space for web viewing (most browsers are not aware of the colour space and sRGB is the closest to what they can show, *hope that made sense, it is a minefield*)

:toast:
Posted by eric weight on July 15, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Hi Dave,
This is a nice shot, but I can't make my mind up about the 2nd bird. Probably better without it for me, or if they had been seperated a bit more. You have made good use of the flash.
:wavey: Eric
Posted by Robert Lawrence on July 17, 2008 at 8:29 AM
Hello Dave,
I like the composition on this one and don't mind the oof bird in the background. Rob's work has improved greatly what I 'm seeing on this monitor. I agree with Phil about lack of catchlight but I can appreciate the difficulty in getting any life in the eyes on a puffin as they seem to have such small and deep set eyes.