Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Andrew's Pyramid

Discussion

13 replies
Posted by Erik Stensland on August 13, 2008 at 1:24 PM
Yesterday morning I went up to Andrew's Tarn up above the Loch in RMNP for sunrise. It is a place with a lot of great rock formations. I shot this at 17mm with my 5D and was as wide as I could go. As usual, there were no clouds to work with. I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this one. Thanks!

Here's an alternate vertical version, taken a little earlier in the morning.
Posted by Todd Caudle on August 13, 2008 at 2:11 PM
I appreciate you avoiding the temptation to make that sky as dark as deep space. Really nice comp, and the way that shadowy pinnacle on the left counterbalances the rightward lean of the main subject is nothing short of brilliant.
Posted by Jack Garrett on August 13, 2008 at 2:47 PM
I like the horizontal much better. I agree with Todd about the counterbalance in this shot and as usual, your exposure is right on...nice job!

Jack
Posted by Doug Andrews on August 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM
Well I'm going to be contrary and say that I prefer the vertical shot better.
Posted by Jackson Frishman on August 13, 2008 at 3:11 PM
Same here, I like the vertical. The pyramid seems more imposing there, I like the feel of standing in the sweep of the stream, and it feels a little more 3-D to me. Both fine shots, though!
Posted by Paul Beiser on August 13, 2008 at 3:58 PM
oh my, that vertical one is really nice, I much prefer it over the horizontal.
Posted by Laurie Wendt on August 13, 2008 at 6:28 PM
Erik,

Both are very nice. Very Nice golden light. If I must choose a favorite I think I prefer the horizontal one.
I really like the red brownish flowers? that you included on the shoreline. Excellent comps on both.
Posted by Don Grall on August 14, 2008 at 4:20 AM
First off, great shot and composition, and exposure. I prefer the horizontal as presented, if the vertical version had more of the Peak in the frame I would probably prefer it, but it feels like part of the left shoulder is cut off.
Posted by Bret Edge on August 14, 2008 at 6:31 AM
I like 'em both, Erik. Really a dramatic peak there. A tad more room at the top of this one would be nice as the peak feels a little cramped up there. Aside from that minor little critique - awesome!
Posted by Rick Dunn on August 14, 2008 at 9:59 AM
Ditto Bret's comments - they both work well, though a little more room at the top of this one would be nice; not critical, but helpful. If you need a little more room for matting/framing, and if it doesn't offend your sensibilities, you could always add more sky at the top digitally. As is, I'd go for the vertical - to me it feels more dramatic with a stronger lead-in.
Posted by Pam Colander on August 14, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Not much more to add that hasn't been said Erik. The only other suggestion is if you want clouds, take Todd with you :wink:

Pam
Posted by Dan Walters on August 17, 2008 at 9:44 AM
Nice shot! Love the early light and the details in the rocks.
Posted by Dan Walters on August 17, 2008 at 9:44 AM
Nice shot! Love the early light and the details in the rocks.
Posted by Jack Brauer on August 19, 2008 at 12:37 AM
Mentioning the 17mm lens really puts this into perspective... you must have been looking straight up! The mountain looks really imposing, almost disconcertingly so, if the angle is as steep as I think it is.