Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Washington Gulch Rainbow

Discussion

10 replies
Posted by Nat Coalson on August 25, 2008 at 1:15 PM
Monte Trumbull and I were in Crested Butte a few weeks ago and had some really great shooting conditions. Here's the first one I've processed from the trip.

I'm interested in critique on the overall tonal range; the darkness conveys the mood I wanted, and is accurate to what it really looked like, but I wonder if it just comes across looking underexposed?

Nothing is clipped.
Posted by Stan Rose on August 25, 2008 at 1:25 PM
Great light, Nat, and i love the bow placement. I think the exposure is perfect, but i would like to see the fg flower/grass sharper, assuming this is not due to wind.
Posted by Don Grall on August 25, 2008 at 1:40 PM
I like the highlight areas being separated by the dark valley, it gives it great depth. I wish the bow was brighter though, could be my CRT monitor
Posted by Jack Brauer on August 25, 2008 at 2:02 PM
The rainbow isn't very prominent, but I don't think that matters at all because the yellow light and dark blue clouds are awesome!
Posted by Laurent Baig on August 25, 2008 at 2:18 PM
What Jack said!
Posted by Joshua Hardin on August 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM
I agree with what's been said above. The contrast is very pleasing, the placement of the rainbow is perfect and the blue shadow colors are nice. I also agree with Stan about the sharpening.
Posted by Rand Herman on August 25, 2008 at 8:08 PM
Beautiful image Nat. I definately need to attend one of your workshops to improve my PS and Lightroom skills.
Posted by Kalin Wilson on August 25, 2008 at 8:39 PM
I like the moodiness and I tend to favor a slight underexposure for the contrast and saturation. I like the composition too. I think if it were mine I'd neutralize the blue of the clouds and distant ridges just a tad so it doesn't feel like there is a cast but I think it works as is too.
Posted by Jesse Speer on August 26, 2008 at 9:01 PM
I agree with the consensus here. The spotlighting in the foreground is very pleasing. And I like the cool/warm contrast in color.
Posted by Nat Coalson on August 27, 2008 at 12:50 AM
Thanks, everyone, for the feedback. I'm glad something about it resonates; I'm usually not much for grand scenics. But the mood of this worked for me, maybe it's the the blue vs. yellow.

The main reaction I have to the picture is from the opposing, interlocking triangles coming in from both sides (horizontal movement) with the arc of the rainbow countering them (vertical downward). There's a ping-pong eye movement happening, kind of a right-to-left upward swirl, that continually resolves in the lake at the end of the rainbow. I keep looking at the photo, and my eyes keep doing the same thing, back and forth. It's a simple, smooth movement, and it draws me in -- just like it did when I was standing there. This is what I hoped to convey with the composition, though I honestly didn't get it completely until processing.

Stan and Joshua, I'm not sure about any sharpness problems with the flowers in the foreground, aside from some sloppy downsampling/sharpening when I made the jpg. The detail is there in the DNG, and actually this jpg looks over-sharp on my display. Can you tell me about your display and settings? I'd like to see if I can process this better for screen output.
Posted by Laurie Wendt on August 27, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Nat, This is an awesome shot! The light is phenomenal! I love everything about this and wouldn't change a thing. I agree that the combination of yellows and blues really make this shot outstanding.