Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Mute Swan

Discussion

12 replies
Posted by Kim Connolly on October 3, 2008 at 6:52 AM
Mute Swan
Don't often take Mute Swan but as nothing much else was about .....
40d +400mmf5.6
ISO 500
f5.6
1/1250"
AV
-1ev
Posted by Barrie Harwood on October 3, 2008 at 7:00 AM
The composition is nice and exposure looks good but there does seem to be some very dodgy looking cloning or wherever at the bottom left :smile:

Would be nice to see larger on the screen if possible
Posted by Andy Astbury on October 3, 2008 at 7:32 AM
I've had a quick play Kim - hope you don't mind :wink: :wink:

You've exposed the swans very well and they really 'pop' against that under exposed background.
But they desperately needed a bit of room on the left so they have 'somewhere to go' in the frame.

The water fading to dark needs a lot more care as it looks a bit harsh, but you can get the general idea.

Nicely exposed image imo :wavey:
Posted by Drew Mellowship on October 3, 2008 at 8:13 AM
I quite like the original apart from two things: the cloning in the bottom left(already said) and the other being the swans foot, seems to drag my attention to one side. Apart from those minor things it looks pretty good !

Drew :smile:
Posted by Robert Lawrence on October 3, 2008 at 8:40 AM
Apart from the nits mentioned I like this a lot.
ROBERT
Posted by Kim Connolly on October 3, 2008 at 1:01 PM
Hi thanks for the comments - appreciated. Yes the cloning at the left, I wasn't quite sure what to do here - there was another, but out of focus swan, infront of the two in my picture. Hence I cloned it out - badly it would seem :biggrin: . Yes the second version is a big improvement - thank you Andy - but I think I would have compromised with the amount of space on the left - and not made it quite as much!!!
Posted by Tom Smit on October 3, 2008 at 1:26 PM
Good picture. Everything else is mentioned and done.
:toast:
Posted by Rob Howard on October 3, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Hi Kim,

Nits mentioned. IMO Andy nhas given it just the right amount to give the birds an area to swim into, any less and for me it would be to tight. Think this would look really good with a nice B/W conversion too.

Regards

Rob
Posted by keith mitchell on October 3, 2008 at 2:43 PM
Hi Kim.
Like it a lot,you will just have to be careful with that clone tool : :biggrin:

Cheers Keith.
Posted by Ian Mason on October 3, 2008 at 3:41 PM
Nice mood in this one. I didn't notice the cloning until it was pointed out. Agree about the composition.
Posted by Paula Graham on October 3, 2008 at 4:01 PM
Elegant artistic shot, especially the 2nd pic.
Posted by Danny Green on October 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM
Wonderful shot kim just wonderful

Danny :toast:
Posted by Paul Inglis on October 4, 2008 at 5:05 AM
Hi Kim,

Lovely shot! I agree with Andy's comments.
:toast: :toast: :toast: