I personally wouldn't. I'd be worried that it would suggest too much reliance on old images.
Just my personal opinion anyway!
Posted by Dawn Monrose on October 4, 2008 at 5:08 AM
I wouldn't either, if they didn't suceed the first time, they won't the second. Also, at Uni, we were always told to shoot especially for the competition rather than just look through your files and see whats suitable. I guess there's not always time, but it's good to look at something afresh and try to get something new and a bit different.....
Posted by Elliott Neep on October 4, 2008 at 5:40 AM
It really depends on the competition. If it is for a magazine, the editorial staff are unlikely to have changed. However, if it is WPOTY of another global competition, the first round of edits is carried out by contracted picture researchers. These change every year, so yes, it is worth resubmitting. Never get downtrodden by competitions (or lack of winning) - they are purely subjective!
Thats interesting Elliot. I didn't realise that WPOTY used contracted picture researchers to do the initial sift. Isuppose the advertised judges would go blind having to go through 32,000 images (or whatever number they are up to now).
Robert
Posted by Elliott Neep on October 4, 2008 at 3:24 PM
As far as I am aware, the researchers first edit reduces the numbers to around 500!!!!!
Discussion
7 repliesJR
I personally wouldn't. I'd be worried that it would suggest too much reliance on old images.
Just my personal opinion anyway!
Robert