Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Bandon Beach: To Crop or Not To Crop?

Discussion

17 replies
Posted by Sean Bagshaw on November 26, 2008 at 1:08 PM
Bandon Beach: To Crop or Not To Crop?
A couple minutes of warm morning light came through and lit up the rocks, and I liked the patterns and reflections in the sand. However, I'm not sure if there is too much FG in the uncropped version. I don't like to crop if I can help it, but willing to if needed. Better cropped or not?
Posted by Sean Bagshaw on November 26, 2008 at 1:09 PM
...and the cropped version.
Posted by David Taylor on November 26, 2008 at 1:23 PM
That's not an easy choice. The original displays the grandness of Bandon, but the second is more intimate. I'm easing towards the cropped option, it feels as though there is a natural vignette with the darker tones in the periphery - which draws my eyes in smoothly to the center of the frame. It doesn't seem like my eyes are drawn in as easily in the original comp. Hope that makes sense.
Great image by the way, the sweeping undulations in the sand and water help guide the vision into the heart of the frame. Nicely done!

:toast:
Posted by Roman Johnston on November 26, 2008 at 1:29 PM
I like you do not like cropping after the fact as a personal dicipline. With that said, the cropped version has my vote (only slightly).

BTW...excellent capture.

Roman
Posted by David Anderson on November 26, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Sean, very nice image.

Tough choice, however, I tend to lean towards the un-cropped version. If I were to crop I think I might go a bit deeper, perhaps just below the first set of ripples in the sand.
Posted by Douglas Dietiker on November 26, 2008 at 2:04 PM
Ok, when I saw the original first I thought, looks great dont crop. When I scrolled down I thought nice, really looks good cropped.

I like the crop. But I dont think you can go wrong either way :toast: (how's that for waffling?)
Posted by Rick Dunn on November 26, 2008 at 2:12 PM
I like the depth of the uncropped version. Both are visually appealing, but the cropped version sacrifices the subtle character of the dark-to-light transition, imo.
Posted by Ned Fenimore on November 26, 2008 at 3:26 PM
Yes..
Posted by Aaron Ellingsen on November 26, 2008 at 3:36 PM
Uncropped for me. The darker sand in the FG anchors the image better than the crop. I do think that if you added a vingette or darkened the lower section of the second image it would work better than it does now. The extra transition from dark to light in the FG helps to propel you into and through the image. Another thing that just came to mind, is maybe add some selective sharpening to the sand to give it a little more grit and texture. Just an idea though. Other than that, this is a fine representation of Bandon. Well done.
Posted by Mark Hudon on November 26, 2008 at 4:02 PM
Crop me, baby, crop me!
Posted by David Cobb on November 26, 2008 at 6:01 PM
The great thing about this, is that it isn't an "either/or" question Sean - why not keep both.

David M. Cobb
Posted by John Lehmkuhl on November 26, 2008 at 10:06 PM
Crop #1
Nice!!
Posted by Joseph Campisi on November 26, 2008 at 11:30 PM
Hmmm... hard choice. The first version better leads your eye through the scene, but the second version is more balanced. Works for me either way, but if I had to choose, I would probably lean slightly towards the crop.
Posted by Ryan Dyar on November 27, 2008 at 2:37 AM
I'm on the crop team! :toast:

The cropped version has more balance to me, and you're not losing any lines or forground interest by cropping either. To me the cropped version has everything that the original has, just in a more balanced way. Great shot either way Sean!
Posted by Marc Dilley on November 27, 2008 at 9:35 AM
This is indeed a tough choice as they're both good; I could either way. But the image is really about the patterns in sand, and #1 tells the story more completely in my view, and that's the version I think I prefer. That stated, I played around a bit with a crop off the right edge and am wondering whether removing some of the vignetted sky might strengthen the image even more.
Posted by Ian Cox-Leigh on November 27, 2008 at 8:00 PM
Both are great images, but, my vote is either to crop more or not at all.

I find the crop offered sacrifices the depth of the original without gaining enough of a focal point in the rock.

I like the depth and the dark to light progression of the original. The sand patterns are the focus and the light glistening off of them is wonderful.
Posted by John Higby on November 28, 2008 at 12:12 PM
WOW ! What a choice, sure glad I don't have to make it. ;-)

The grandeur of the 1st is slightly more desirable to me.

Posted by Rajeev Thomas on December 7, 2008 at 4:12 AM
Please don't crop....there is so much more impact in the uncropped version. Great job capturing an excellent moment!!! regards, Rajeev :toast: