Posted by Rick Dunn on December 1, 2008 at 3:11 PM
The price strategy is peculiar. Like Mark, I won't be trading up to this baby. If anything, a switch over to the 5D II would make much more sense. Or waiting until a D700 replacement hits the market.
I can't fathom how this is worth $5,000 more than a 5D II....
Posted by Nick Leadley on December 15, 2008 at 11:50 AM
I have to agree with Rick Dunn on this one.
I'm a long time Nikon shooter and was at first excited on hearing about the D3X...until I started comparison shopping and amid reading reviews started researching the 5D Mark II....which I am now considering buying for at least the studio work I do and possibly the start of switching to Canon exclusively.
Posted by Don Miller on December 15, 2008 at 2:03 PM
I've had the 5DII for several weeks and I think the movie mode is significant.
The FF Sony would be a good studio camera, but less adaptable to Nikon lenses.
I really like the direction Nikon has taken with its new glass. I use the 14-24 on my Canons.
Discussion
6 replieshttp://sebrogers.typepad.com/
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3x/sample.htm
How do you guys feel this compares to Canon?
I can't fathom how this is worth $5,000 more than a 5D II....
I'm a long time Nikon shooter and was at first excited on hearing about the D3X...until I started comparison shopping and amid reading reviews started researching the 5D Mark II....which I am now considering buying for at least the studio work I do and possibly the start of switching to Canon exclusively.
The FF Sony would be a good studio camera, but less adaptable to Nikon lenses.
I really like the direction Nikon has taken with its new glass. I use the 14-24 on my Canons.