Posted by Nate Burgess on December 2, 2008 at 8:06 PM
So I saw Todds and thought it was great!! I thought I would share my version of last nights event.
I got to shooting just after the color started to fade so the clouds arent nearly as brilliant as his...
Thoughts welcome
Posted by John Klotz on December 2, 2008 at 9:43 PM
Very cool Nate! Please provide the details, lens, exposure etc.
Posted by Todd Caudle on December 2, 2008 at 10:28 PM
I was kind of disappointed by the high, thin clouds when I was shooting mine, but the results are quite nice. I like that you got that ethereal glow around the moon, too. Could use some terrestrial context, but not required.
Posted by Nate Burgess on December 2, 2008 at 10:29 PM
D700
200mm
f2.8
.5 seconds
iso 640
Thanks for the Comment John!!
Todd - Thanks for the comment.. I really liked your shot a lot and wish i had thought about shooting some forground..
personally i think yours was better
Posted by Erik Aagaard on December 3, 2008 at 10:52 AM
Interesting how the same subject can be shot so very differently!
Hard to say which I like better - they have totally different moods and feels. This one is very dramatic with the high swirling clouds, while Todd's is maybe prettier in the traditional sense. I like 'em both a whole lot!
Posted by Michael Renner on December 3, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Great shot Nate!! I can appreciate this view as this is about what I saw when I left work that night.
Discussion
6 repliesI got to shooting just after the color started to fade so the clouds arent nearly as brilliant as his...
Thoughts welcome
200mm
f2.8
.5 seconds
iso 640
Thanks for the Comment John!!
Todd - Thanks for the comment.. I really liked your shot a lot and wish i had thought about shooting some forground..
personally i think yours was better
Hard to say which I like better - they have totally different moods and feels. This one is very dramatic with the high swirling clouds, while Todd's is maybe prettier in the traditional sense. I like 'em both a whole lot!