Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Common Whelk (Buccinum undatum)

Discussion

3 replies
Posted by Drew Mellowship on January 22, 2009 at 8:35 AM
Good afternoon all, hope you are all well.

I took this shot after straying from my main task of SEO's in north Norfolk a few weeks back and have only now just got round to doing anything with it. I don't think there's anything great about it but I just thought some may find it interesting, as far as I am aware you don't normally see these out of the sea/sand.

I would imagine the seagulls wouldn't have given it much of a chance after I had left. Any comments are always welcome either good or bad, it's the only way I'll learn :wink: !!


Nikon D300
Sigma 180mm
ISO 160
1/15 at F10 & o55XB

Drew :smile:
Posted by Ray on January 22, 2009 at 9:39 AM
Sorry Drew this just doesn’t grab me, there’s nothing wrong with it, just one of those things I suppose.

Now, if the weather had been kind to you, a nice blue sky and all that, then I think a shot along the beach, using an ultra wide angle, with the Whelk large in the foreground, would have worked really well. Just a thought.
Posted by Mark Sisson on January 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM
It looks a bit caught between two stools to me Drew - if it had been a tighter crop of the whelk that might have worked, but I suspect seeing more od the lovely shell in the sandy environ might have worked best.

You have to try these things though so good on you for that.

Mark

:toast:
Posted by Matt Cole on January 22, 2009 at 4:15 PM
Hi Drew, it's a slight shame the whelk didn't show a bit more of itself. I agree this one doesn't quite work, but worth a go and good to see something different.

Matt