Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Sanderling + re post

Discussion

17 replies
Posted by Sandra Hendrikse on February 3, 2009 at 10:05 AM
Sanderling + re post
The Sanderling has turned up quite frequently on this form lately, so I hope you are not bored with another one.

Nikon D80 @ 420 mm, iso 250, f8, 1/640 sec. on a tripod.
Posted by Brett Lewis on February 3, 2009 at 10:19 AM
Nice work Sandra, Good detail and setting but a little shame it wasn't higher in the frame so we could see more of the reflection.. From that I might take a bit of the top to balance it up a bit..

Kind regards,

Brett :toast: :toast:
Posted by David Sewell on February 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM
I agree with Brett about the reflection, but other than that a superb shot with the whites handled very well.

David
Posted by Ian Mason on February 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Lovely! Nice details and colour. I like the raised foot. Agree about the refllection, but that's minor.
Posted by John Chapman on February 3, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Hi Sandra, nice capture and I like the water droplet on the bird's beak. :toast:
Posted by Guy Rogers on February 3, 2009 at 2:35 PM
Hello Sandra.

You have captuted the Sanderling beautfully, really like the pose with the raised leg and the water drop on the beak.

The only nit is the composition. As the Sanderling is in the lower half of the picture and the top half is empty. ( although it is a nice back drop ) It makes you want to see the reflection even more. I feel if you do crop some of the top, this would put even more impact of the Sanderling, and take some of the need to see the reflection away. If this was mine I think I would crop just above the out of focused water in the top third of the picture. For me the out of focused water adds some depth to the image so I would keep this in.

Just my thoughts.

:wavey: :wavey: :wavey:
Posted by PhilH on February 3, 2009 at 2:47 PM
A very nice Sanderling.... never tire of seeing images of them.... do agree about the composition though... it does need more room below and less atop.....

Great exposure with detail perfectly maintained...

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by Sandra Hendrikse on February 3, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Thank you all for your comments. I fully agree about the composition and therefore I’ve posted another crop. As you can see there is a small strip of sand in the water, which causes the problem. It is such a pity, but nothing much you can do about it. The only thing is perhaps trying to clone it out.
Posted by Ian Mason on February 3, 2009 at 4:19 PM
Aha - that's better! The strip of sand is fine.
Posted by Des Ong on February 3, 2009 at 4:31 PM
I too think the 2nd version looks better, nothing wrong with a bit of sand in a picture of shore bird! :smile:
Posted by Robert Lawrence on February 4, 2009 at 3:49 AM
"nd image for me too. An excellent shot with bags of detail.
Robert
Posted by Andy Astbury on February 4, 2009 at 5:00 AM
2nd crop works MUCH better Sandra - the strip of sand isn't a problem really.
Posted by Andy Shepherd on February 4, 2009 at 9:34 AM


Top Sanderling shot Sandra, the repost is right on the money.

Andy... :smile:
Posted by Drew Mellowship on February 4, 2009 at 9:57 AM
Well I have to agree with the nits beforehand but, hey, you blew those nits outta the water with the repost - well done Sandra !

Drew :smile:
Posted by Fran French on February 4, 2009 at 1:18 PM
Nice one Sandra, the repost is much better. Like it very much.

Fran :toast:
Posted by tony flashman on February 4, 2009 at 2:50 PM
The repost is way better.
I love these little birds........keep em coming
The little drip of water on the birds beak has reminded me to get something for my cold.

Tony :toast:
Posted by Ray on February 4, 2009 at 4:31 PM
Both shots have their merits, with the repost just getting it, the water droplet and raised foot really makes this.
Posted by Nigel Blake on February 5, 2009 at 3:30 AM
Very nice indeed, a favourite bird subject of mine, the second version is a far superior comp, well done.