Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

The Hardy Girls (and boys)

Discussion

7 replies
Posted by Chris Johnstone on April 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM
The Hardy Girls (and boys)
Here's another from Scotland, now a week ago. The males kept their eyebrows hidden most of the time so the majority of birds there were females. I saw four birds in this photograph but I wouldn't be surprised if another one was lurking about.

The projected bird atlas is worrying for these troopers. You'd have thought they have it tough enough already...

Thanks for your interest.

Chris
Posted by Peter Cairns on April 5, 2009 at 2:40 PM
Not sure this quite works as well as your others Chris. I like the idea, just not sure the birds are obvious enough to make it effective.

Pete
Posted by Daniel Read on April 5, 2009 at 3:00 PM
I have to agree with Pete on this one, If you hadn't said there were birds in this shot I wouldn't have known what the subject matter was! It's good to try something different though :smile:

Cheers,

Dan.
Posted by Matt Peaster on April 5, 2009 at 3:11 PM
Chris,
While the birds don't jump out at you - I'll take your word of 4 :smile: - the image puts the bird's environment and battle for survival into context. With the other images you got you've got a good broad range to 'tell the story'. Good work.

Matt
Posted by eric weight on April 6, 2009 at 1:02 AM
As a shot to demonstrate the effectiveness of their camo, this is spot on, but as an image in its own right, I agree that it doesn't quite work. Nevertheless a very interesting post.

:toast: Eric
Posted by PhilH on April 6, 2009 at 3:40 AM
May not be quite there... as Eric says it certainly shows how effectively hidden they can be....

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by Matt Cole on April 6, 2009 at 5:27 AM
certainly an interesting shot, but perhaps one that works better a bit larger as no doubt the birds would show up a bit more.

Matt
Posted by John Chapman on April 6, 2009 at 6:58 AM
I have to agree with Pete on this one Chris. :toast: