Just to prove that we occasionally get blue skies and fluffy white clouds "Up North".
I wanted to convey the environment that the bird chooses to live in by including some of the buildings. It breaks the "hand of man" rule of thumb for Nature images and I'd be interested in your thoughts.
Would you include the buildings or exclude the buildings?
1/1600 AND f11? Presumably a very high asa as well. I like it, but then I am always impressed by flight shots. The little bit of building visible does help to convey the urban environment where the species often lives, and I would therefore say it was appropriate to leave it in.
Just a tad overflashed (assumed by low eye catchlight and leg shadows? - not in your tech specs), the background needs raising in brightness, it looks very like a studio shot at present
Brilliant Austin - love it and I'd say include MORE of the buildings if you have that option. Personally, I'd like to see more such story-telling images attempted. First class.
A tad overdone on the flash, and I'm with Pete on the more buildings in view if possible, great stuff I love it, always good to see inventive work that carries wildlife photography forwards like this does.
Fantastic shot Austin! I agree more buildings would improve this even more.Only other photogs will notice the flash, so no biggie there. Was this approaching a feeder? I want to start doing more of these setups myself...
Discussion
9 repliesJust to prove that we occasionally get blue skies and fluffy white clouds "Up North".
I wanted to convey the environment that the bird chooses to live in by including some of the buildings. It breaks the "hand of man" rule of thumb for Nature images and I'd be interested in your thoughts.
Would you include the buildings or exclude the buildings?
1DMk3, 24-70mm, f11,1/1600.
C&C welcome.
Cheers
Austin
David
Good effort all the same
Pete
Billy
I think flash is oke.
Agree with the more buildings comment, give it more of that urban feel.
Gavin