Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Oystercatcher (update - with larger version)

Discussion

14 replies
Posted by Ian Mason on May 10, 2009 at 8:34 AM
Oystercatcher (update - with larger version)
1d2n, 600mm f4 is x1.4, 1/1000s, f7.1, iso 200.

Ican't make my mind up about cropping this one. The blue patch is a loch in the background and, for me, sets the scene. However, that might not work for those who weren't there. I have room on both side. Should I include any, more of the loch, or should I just crop it out?

Larger version here
Posted by Craig Jones on May 10, 2009 at 8:56 AM
Very nice, crop out the loch for me, the main focus will be on this beautiful bird rather than my eye driffing off to the top-right hand corner,love the catch light in the eye :wink: :wink: :wavey:
Posted by Simon Litten on May 10, 2009 at 9:44 AM
I always vote for as much of the environment as possible, as long as its not man-made straight edges. That aside, beautiful image - one of the best Oystercatcher shots I've seen. Love the vivid colours against the muted background/foreground.

Simon
Posted by Ian Mason on May 10, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Thanks guys!

Here's a wider version - I think I prefer it.
Posted by Tim Gregory on May 10, 2009 at 11:16 AM
I prefer the first, as the blue water and lump on the right isn't drawing my eye as much!

1st shows a lot more detail on the bird in my opinion :)
Posted by Simon Litten on May 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Yes, that's even better! That'll look great as a print.

Simon
Posted by Lewis Thomson on May 10, 2009 at 12:05 PM

Hi Ian,

Super shot, love the colour of that beak against the background. I'm not too keen on the blue, if it was me I think I would crop it to portrait.

Lewis.
:toast:
Posted by Tim Taylor on May 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM
It's a beautiful shot. The first is more interesting for web presentation but the second would probably look better printed. Another thing you could do if you wanted would be to clone some of the brown stuff over the loch to remove the distraction. Alternatively, if it's a 'secondary feature', leave it.

Tim :toast:
Posted by Malcolm Muir on May 10, 2009 at 12:41 PM
Beautiful Ian - the blue of teh loch really makes it and is much improved in the second crop.

Malcolm :toast:
Posted by Billy Fairburn on May 10, 2009 at 5:49 PM
Repost is brilliant Ian - very well done
Posted by Fran French on May 10, 2009 at 5:56 PM
Had a job making my mind up on which I prefer, both great shots, but I somehow think the detail in the first clinches it for me.

Fran :toast:
Posted by Lee Newman on May 10, 2009 at 5:57 PM
I like to see a bit of enviroment in shots Ian so its the second for me. This image would suit any style because its such a good shot of the bird itself. Very nice details & well exposed.

Lee
Posted by PhilH on May 11, 2009 at 3:42 AM
Second for me.... in the first the blue of the Loch looks too much like somebodies elbow has gotten in the way....

:toast: :wavey: :toast:
Posted by Mark Hamblin on May 11, 2009 at 5:05 PM
I'd crop it to vertical but its a great shot anyway!
Posted by Craig Churchill on May 12, 2009 at 6:48 AM
Agree with Mark,vertical would work well but nice as is!!

Craig
www.craigchurchill.co.uk