Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

ACQUINE

Discussion

3 replies
Posted by Doug Dolde on May 19, 2009 at 9:28 PM
This is certainly an interesting way to evaluate an image.

http://acquine.alipr.com/
Posted by Dan Borzynski on May 19, 2009 at 10:15 PM
I saw that the other day and thought it was interesting. I know a lot of people will be offended by the idea of a computer ranking image quality but it does seem to do a decent job of a general ordering. If you dig far enough into, there is a definite trend as you go down the rankings. Most of the really nice images are near the top and more poorer images near the bottom. And there certainly are some that I look at the ranking and go "Huh?"

I'd be curious to know how it works behind the scenes.

And remember that in the end, we are doing this because we enjoy and not to get some computerized score.
Posted by Pete D on May 22, 2009 at 10:35 PM
I ran about a dozen of my images through the process. Apparently, my photography sucks. Thank goodness acquine is not my customer. Oh wait, I don't have customers.

Pete D.
Posted by Sue Alden on May 31, 2009 at 10:53 AM
I ran an image that placed third in a gallery juried show and it was also one out of 5 images that sold during that show and it received a 35 out of 100 from acquine. Glad they did not use that software to judge the exhibit...