OK, it isn't the flowers of the Columbia Gorge, but it is as close as we come down here at the low end of the state. The wind was blowing like the Gorge, however.
I have some issues with the image, but it is one of the better hill/flower/late light shots from down here that I have managed. Some things that are problematic for me are the featureless sky, the overpowering sun (necessary for backlighting however), the best compositions didn't have many flowers in the FG and it was too windy to get real close to anything in the FG. So what's to like? I think the overall quality of light is pleasing and there are enough landmarks in the photo that it will have local appeal to folks familiar with the hills and valleys to the east of Ashland.
So I guess I kind of just gave my own critique there, but I'm always appreciative of feedback from others as well.
I certainly agree that the light quality is very nice but I personally don't think the sun is overpowering and I do think that the sky is fine; there are some clouds on the right and it is not a dominant part of your comp so it doesn't matter anyway. Nice stuff.
You're critique reminds me of the scene in Liar Liar where Jim Carey beats himself up . Your points are well taken, but this is still a great shot!! The light, color, and depth work well. I too like a little off the right (and a touch off the bottom) to focus on the best parts.
Posted by Austin Booth on May 29, 2009 at 12:49 PM
I think the lighting and composition in this one are great...sure we all strive to get the most breathtaking sunsets and it would have been nice with a few more flowers in the foreground but you made the best of what you had to work with and it turned out great. The sky is simple and does not distract the viewer and steal all the attention so that they can focus more on all those interesting foreground details.
Much appreciated comments folks! Paul - no filters used here. I seem to always just add flare issues to my photos when I add filters while shooting into the sun. Instead I went the time intensive route of blending five different exposures, two for the FG, one for the valley area and two for the sky. The FG exposures are shot with my hand in front of the sun to keep the flare out. It is time consuming and doesn't always work out, but it seems like I get my best results this way.
I went back to the same spot last night and did get some interesting sunset action, so we'll see if that enabled me to improve on this effort.
Sean, I'll be in Oregon the week of June 8 -14. Are there any wildflower locations that
you would recommend? Are the wildflowers in the Columbia River Gorge past peak?
Thank you.
Discussion
10 repliesI have some issues with the image, but it is one of the better hill/flower/late light shots from down here that I have managed. Some things that are problematic for me are the featureless sky, the overpowering sun (necessary for backlighting however), the best compositions didn't have many flowers in the FG and it was too windy to get real close to anything in the FG. So what's to like? I think the overall quality of light is pleasing and there are enough landmarks in the photo that it will have local appeal to folks familiar with the hills and valleys to the east of Ashland.
So I guess I kind of just gave my own critique there, but I'm always appreciative of feedback from others as well.
David M. Cobb
Btw, saw your POTD today on BP.com, congrats there too!
I went back to the same spot last night and did get some interesting sunset action, so we'll see if that enabled me to improve on this effort.
You have great lighting. I love the gnarled trees on the right side.
you would recommend? Are the wildflowers in the Columbia River Gorge past peak?
Thank you.