On Monday I had the opportunity to watch a spectacular sunrise from Sprague Lake. I posted one of these images on the ESS gallery and received some helpful feedback. I'm now trying to decide which of these two images to print. What are your thoughts? Should I go with image number 1 or image number 2?
#1 I like this one because its a little more subtle.
Posted by Doug Andrews on June 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM
I say #2 as I prefer the reflections in this one. Both are very nice though.
Posted by Laurie Wendt on June 13, 2009 at 1:32 PM
Eric, I also prefer #2. It has a brighter feel to it. I really like the 2nd because it has more pretty blue sky and brighter sunset color. By the way, Very Beautiful image!
I think the wider angle in #1 makes for a better composition, but the cloud reflection is certainly better in #2. So I guess I'd go for #2 by a smidge.
Posted by Rod Chandler on June 13, 2009 at 2:26 PM
Erik, I prefer #1 with the more subtle colors. It seems more natural to me. Either one would be a prize-winner, however. Thanks for asking.
Erik, both are awesome shots, I think it boils down to which one better suits the environment you are going to display in. For example, the color of the wall, with/without spotlight..etc. And how large you are going to print also affects the decision I guess. Personally I'd print number 2. :-)
I see image #2 is winning, but here's another vote for #1. My reason being the more natural looking colours, and the less bright horizon and middle reflection areas.
Wow, tough call. But I'd definitely vote for #1 because of the composition - specifically the way that the gap in the clouds mirrors the shape of the front pond.
The second shot has slightly more spectacular color, but it seems a bit ordinary composition-wise compared with the first.
Come on guys! You're not helping at all!! The vote is pretty much split with good reasons on either side. I agree that the composition in #1 is more interesting and the color is more dramatic in #2. Perhaps it would be simpler just to ask which image is likely to sell better, though I already know that most people could care less about subtleties of composition and just want something dramatic for their wall.
Posted by Dan Walters on June 13, 2009 at 11:54 PM
I really like the more natural clouds in the first image.
Posted by Eric Vaughan on June 14, 2009 at 7:04 AM
#2 is the one I would print.
Posted by Jack Garrett on June 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Here's a thought based on my Ouzel Falls shot. I've sold three of these already....thanks again Erik, I owe ya lunch! I showed my first shot and the corrected shot to my clients and one of them bought the original and the other 2 wanted the "corrected" version. So, you may have possibilities with both. I'd at least consider putting both of them on your site and give the clients a choice if that makes sense.
Jack
Posted by Paul Wegemann on June 14, 2009 at 11:47 AM
Boy, am I late to this party. I personally prefer #1, due to the wider view, but I totally get why #2 is so appealing. I think Todd nailed it, but Jack's idea is good too. I would love to have to make such a decision.
Posted by Jennifer Geck on June 14, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Hi Erik. Both are beautiful, but I prefer #1. As some have already said, the comp is better and the colors more natural. Plus, I like the warm and cool contrast in #1. Also, in #2 there's somewhat of a horizontal white line (in the reflection) at the far edge of the lake that I find a little distracting, especially since it's dead center.
Which would sell better? Depends on your audience, I guess. I think you're right, though, that the average Joe would probably pick #2 because they would like the intense pinks.
Thanks everyone for your input! I think I'll probably work mostly with the second one as I think it is more likely to sell. As Jack suggested I will hold on to the other one, which is better in many ways, for other client needs.
Posted by Kalin Wilson on June 15, 2009 at 12:42 AM
#2 - color and drama. Good luck!
Posted by Craig Schultz on June 15, 2009 at 11:18 AM
I'm curious why folks are saying the colors are more "natural" in the first shot??? Eric probably took these the exact same way seconds apart, nothing more natural about the first vs the second; just different.
I feel they both seem a bit dark, especially in the trees on the lake edges; grad line cutting in too much? I'm sure as Eric stood on the lake shore, detail in the trees was easily evident, but to each their own on artistic interpretation of a shot.
The second seems like a much more appealing image to me; color, reflection, less blow out near the sun, cloud highlights are better and I wouldn't worry much about centered horizons on reflections. And let's be serious, no one but anal photographers are going to care about the comp in #1 vs #2
Discussion
31 repliesThe second shot has slightly more spectacular color, but it seems a bit ordinary composition-wise compared with the first.
My thoughts exactly on why I prefer #1. You also included more of that lovely sky in #1.
Cheers,
You really did fine work capturing both of these!
Jack
Jack
Which would sell better? Depends on your audience, I guess. I think you're right, though, that the average Joe would probably pick #2 because they would like the intense pinks.
I feel they both seem a bit dark, especially in the trees on the lake edges; grad line cutting in too much? I'm sure as Eric stood on the lake shore, detail in the trees was easily evident, but to each their own on artistic interpretation of a shot.
The second seems like a much more appealing image to me; color, reflection, less blow out near the sun, cloud highlights are better and I wouldn't worry much about centered horizons on reflections. And let's be serious, no one but anal photographers are going to care about the comp in #1 vs #2