Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Red-legged Partridge - (Alectoris rufa)

Discussion

17 replies
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on June 22, 2009 at 5:21 AM
Red-legged Partridge - (Alectoris rufa)
Quite often I have seen these birds 'hunkering' down in a hollow, but very skittish. However this one obviously just got it's Equity card. The shot I wanted after quietly moving in was when he/she was on the gate post, unfortunately Jenson Button from the Royal Mail had other ideas! :frown:

Not a great composition, just a beautiful bird IMHO.

Steve
MKIII 500f/4 f/8 1/640 ISO200

Posted by David Sewell on June 22, 2009 at 6:50 AM
It is a beautiful bird, but looks a little dark on my monitor. Perhaps a little work on the levels and (possibly) a few passes of unsharp mask would improve the shot further.

David
Posted by Ray on June 22, 2009 at 7:29 AM
A little imagination with a feed and you should get the image you want.

An excellent capture resulting in a first rate portrait.

Did you try flipping it ??
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on June 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM
Hi David

Looks OK on my monitor, plus sharpness too, lets see if there is any more feedback on this, however, thanks?

Thanks Ray, flipping. Why? :confused:

Steve
Posted by Phillip Tomkinson on June 22, 2009 at 8:18 AM
Not a bad image but very dark.

Phil.


:toast: :wavey:
Posted by Lewis Thomson on June 22, 2009 at 8:51 AM

Hi Stephen,

I agree it looks a little dark, but sharpness and detail looks great to me! Nice bird! Not a fan of flipping personally, I really don't think it matters which direction the bird is looking.

Cheers,

Lewis.
:toast:
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on June 22, 2009 at 9:00 AM
OK guys, is this an improvement? :wavey:
Posted by Lewis Thomson on June 22, 2009 at 9:06 AM

Yep, looks great on my screen anyway! :biggrin:

Lewis.
:toast:
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on June 22, 2009 at 9:09 AM
I assume that is the second version Lewis? :smile:
Posted by Ray on June 22, 2009 at 9:18 AM
Wow a question. :wink: :biggrin: :biggrin:

It’s just to do with composition, a lot of photographers think that the strongest comp. is from bottom left to top right, and the most commonly held belief, is that it is the way we read, the Far East is different.

Flipping it doesn’t always work, but it does frequently enough to always give it a go.

Look it makes no real difference to some images, but give it a try, I think that with some images, you will be pleasantly surprised that one ways works does far better than you expect.

I copied your image twice into a landscape A4, and flipped one and I preferred it facing to the right.

I once spoke to a magazines photo editor, and I was told they always try flipping, and as a very general rule, the front covers images faces away from the stapes.

You are the only one who knows which way the subject was in relation to the camera, so its in your hands. All I’m saying is don’t be blinked try it. :wink: :biggrin: :biggrin:

After all it just boils down to personal opinion.
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on June 22, 2009 at 10:03 AM
Both images are the way it was shot, looking right to left. Providing it wasn't wearing a watch or some form of type, flipping an image to increase impact, dynamics, etc fine by me. As far as I am concerned Ray, 'Rules are there for guidance, not a straight jacket' quote SJK. :wavey:

Posted by Mark Davies on June 22, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Either way does it for me , but great interest the comment about cover print .Nice one Steve I like it . :toast:
Posted by Stephen Kaluski on June 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM
Thanks Mark, one the few posts of mine that has provoked a thought? :wavey:

Steve
Posted by keith mitchell on June 22, 2009 at 4:38 PM
Hi stephen.
Looks really good on my gear,real nice capture.
:toast: Keith.
Posted by Des Ong on June 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM
Good capture Steve, a very pretty bird indeed. Prefer no. 2 but not no. 3 - don't know why. :confused:

Des :wavey:
Posted by Brett Lewis on June 23, 2009 at 7:41 AM
Either works for me Steve but welcome the comments about publication nonetheless.. After all the editors will only use such things in the best way they see fit so if you have an image that suits both axes, all the better for it...

Brett :toast:
Posted by Fran French on June 24, 2009 at 2:23 AM
Looks good to me either way, the second being an improvement with the light.

Fran :toast:
Posted by Craig Jones on June 24, 2009 at 5:40 PM
Love it!!!! :wink: :wink: :wavey: