Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Kingfisher

Discussion

13 replies
Posted by Kim Connolly on June 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM
Kingfisher
It is always difficult to post a Kingfisher - there are so many hard acts to follow. This one appeared quite close to the hide where I was -no choice as to position, I used a tripod and remote switch. Virtually as shot - just a little sharpening and crop
C & C welcome
50d +400mmf 5.6
Exposure Time = 1/2000"
F Number = F7.1
Exposure Program = Aperture priority
ISO Speed Ratings = 400

Shutter Speed Value = 11 TV
Aperture Value = 5.63 AV
Exposure Bias Value = -0.33EV
Metering Mode = Pattern
Posted by Paul King on June 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM
HI Kim, looks like you had some harsh light to contend with, did well to stop any blow out on the white .
Posted by Mark Green on June 29, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Hi Kim, Nice kingfisher, how much of a crop is it ??
I would prefer a little more room to the right, plus with such a nice plane back ground i would be tempted to clone out the tree bits at the top.
:toast:

Mark.G
Posted by Dawn Monrose on June 29, 2009 at 1:36 PM
Nice shot, I like the pose. I think I would be tempted to clone out the top branch too, although it does frame the bird. I think I'd like to see a little more room to both sides, as I'm not keen on the square-ish crop. I think it could do with a little more sharpening to my eyes. Still a nice shot, the light's been controlled well.
Posted by Kim Connolly on June 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM
Thanks for that - I agree about the cloning but my recent attempts have not been too successful! Will perhaps have a go!!
Posted by John Robinson on June 29, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Interesting one Kim
I agree with whats been said.
Thought about a vertical crop ???
John
Posted by Fran French on June 29, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Nits already covered. Also I would be tempted to clone out the pink flower on the main branch, if you are able to, as it does draw my eye a bit.

Having said that, a very nice image that I would be well pleased with!

Fran :toast:
Posted by Kim Connolly on June 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM
Many thanks, well I have had a go at the cloning - and here is the result. Hope it has improved things :eek: Just noticed I have left a bit of stump left hand corner!
Probably could still do with a bit more sharpening!!!
Posted by Rene de Heer on June 29, 2009 at 3:25 PM
Repost is better without the stump but it seems to lack a bit of sharpness, maybe a round of USM?
Very nice
Rene de heer
Posted by Mark Green on June 29, 2009 at 3:53 PM
hi Kim i had a little play hope you dont mind, i did one round of USM, and also used Noise Ninja. and cropped it slightly different.



Cheers
Mark :toast:
Posted by keith mitchell on June 29, 2009 at 4:04 PM
Hi Kim.
Now you go steady with that clone tool.
Real nice shot kim bits been covered.
:toast: Keith.
Posted by Kim Connolly on June 29, 2009 at 4:30 PM
Looks loads better - cheers!! :toast:
Posted by Tim Gregory on June 30, 2009 at 8:35 AM
Agree about kingfishers being hard to top, there are a lot of very good photographers who have really mastered doing these birds.

This is a nice image, I think the purple flower on the bottom left spoils it a little, Kim's repost looks best without it but something has gone terribly wrong with the sharpness in that!



Posted by Drew Mellowship on July 2, 2009 at 10:21 AM
All nits metioned of course,the repost works well - well done

Drew :smile: