Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Is anyone using Kingston CF cards?

Discussion

14 replies
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 7:28 AM
My portable storage device has just packed up and rather than spend more money on another one I thought I'd stock up with CF cards instead, mainly for trips away from home.

I normally use the Sandisk cards but I see you can pick up an 8GB 133X Kingston Elite Pro CF card for £14, as opposed to nearly £40 for a Sandisk Extreme.
Quite a substantial saving when you want perhaps half a dozen or more.

Are they any good, i.e. relliable?

I'm not bothered about the very fastest read/write speeds as long as they're not painfully slow, these seem to be fine according to the specs.

Any opinions?
Posted by PhilH on July 7, 2009 at 7:34 AM
Hi Justin

I am using the 4GB Kingston Cards with no trouble whatsoever, in fact I am about to order some more. read/ write seems OK...

HTH

Phil
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 7:40 AM
Thanks Phil.

If you're interested, I've just ordered an 8GB one through Amazon.co.uk for £13.90, although it's actually coming via 7dayshop. The price was actually cheaper this way rather than going direct to 7dayshop.com. The postage was free too.
The 8GB cards were only a little more than the 4GB ones.
Posted by Nick on July 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM
I don't use them for CF/Images, but do use then for SDHC cards for recording audio. I've a few 4Gb and an 8Gb card and so far they've been fine - one even ended up with an involuntary dunking in a rather slimy green rock pool recently - it survived, the recorder needed a lot more TLC to coax it back to life :frown:
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 8:06 AM
Thanks Nick.
Incidentally, Is your Flashtrax still going strong?
Posted by Nick on July 7, 2009 at 8:26 AM
I've still got them although, while they still work, I don't use them any longer - I needed something that had bigger storage and faster download speeds and which would use AA cells in the field - ie could last a week or longer without mains power.
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 8:33 AM
:smile:
Posted by Nigel Blake on July 7, 2009 at 10:29 AM
I have several Transcend CF (2X 8gig & 2X 16gig) and SDHC (5X 16gig type 6) cards that have been very reliable so far, despite these being a lower rating than the Sandisk CF and SDHC cards I have, they are not noticably different in the camera, but slightly slower when downloading to the PC.
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Thanks Nigel. That's good to know. The download speed isn't something I'd be overly concerned about anyway.
Posted by Nigel Blake on July 7, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Me neither; 16gig takes about the same time as it takes for the kettle to boil; perfect! :biggrin:
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM
16gig takes about the same time as it takes for the kettle to boil; perfect!


You took the words right out of my mouth. :biggrin:

In fact I might even have to go for a 32 GB card and have time to make a cheese sandwich to go with the cuppa :biggrin:
Posted by Mark Davies on July 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM
I have 8 no. 8 gig Kingston x133 and none have ever put a foot wrong on the D3. The transcend 4gig aint bad either .
Last time I looked at 7 day it was special offer on the kingstons if you buy more than 1.
In China they work out at about 8 quid each in the electronic stores there .How come we always pay more ?Moan over .
Recommended ?yep!
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 12:56 PM
Cheers Mark.
Posted by Colin Pickett on July 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Did someone mention a cheese sandwich, :jump: Justin I have mixture of cards all makes and sizes I’ve never had one fail, even put an old 1 GB microdrive though a 40 degree wash cycle and it still works.
Posted by Justin on July 7, 2009 at 2:22 PM
Thanks Colin :wavey: