Archive
NPN has moved to naturephotographers.networkYou’re viewing the read-only archive of the original site (2000–2018). The community is active today, with new critiques and discussions every day.
Visit NPN today →
Nature Photographers Network
Forums · UKNP

Little Owl..

Discussion

16 replies
Posted by Brett Lewis on July 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM
Little Owl..
Since there have been a few Little owls posted recently and since I was sorting through some of my recent sightings, I thought I'd share one of the encounters of one of this years young..

Enjoy the rest of your weekend folks..

Brett


Canon 1D Mk3, Canon 100-400mm, HH
1/320 sec @ f 8.0, ISO 400
Landscape crop from portrait
Posted by John Robinson on July 25, 2009 at 7:05 PM
Nice one Brett
Drop the gamma to 70 and really give it sone Guts !
Posted by Brett Lewis on July 25, 2009 at 7:24 PM
Gamma to 70 as requested.. I think it goes to dark for my liking but if it's what you like, I'm happy to accommodate.. Cheers John :wavey:
Posted by Craig Jones on July 25, 2009 at 7:28 PM
Stunning photo of this lovely owl, composition is great and the eyes are magical :wink: :wink: :wavey:
Posted by David Taylor on July 25, 2009 at 7:34 PM
Superb image. Purely subjective, but I prefer the first as posted.

:toast: :toast: :jump:
Posted by Matt Cole on July 26, 2009 at 3:16 AM
a lovely shot Brett I love the eyes. Somewhere between the two posts would be my choice I think. :smile:

Matt
Posted by Tom Smit on July 26, 2009 at 3:55 AM
Great shot and pose. I agree with Matt about Gamma. Somewhere between.
:toast: :toast:
Posted by John Robinson on July 26, 2009 at 6:31 AM
Yes maybe 85 would be more what i meant ! :wink:
They're both Ok anyway.On my monitor if I drop my head 4 inches the first looks fine !!
John
Posted by David Sewell on July 26, 2009 at 9:54 AM
Nice shot either way, but I will go with the majority and say that something between the two looks right to me.

David

:toast:
Posted by Richard Peters on July 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM
Lovely shot as posted originally :toast:
Posted by eric weight on July 26, 2009 at 1:04 PM
Lovely shot, all the nits dealt with already.
:toast: Eric
Posted by Bob Cox on July 26, 2009 at 1:06 PM
Thats nice either way ,perhaps 75 with a bit of shadows and highlights to pull back the shadows on the L/H side of the bird.

Bob.
Posted by Sandra Hendrikse on July 27, 2009 at 2:22 AM
Very nice shot, Brett. Somewhere between the two post would also be my choice.
Posted by Mark Davies on July 27, 2009 at 1:49 PM
processing aside ....cool image . Envious ,still haven't got mine where I want him. :toast:
Posted by Helge Sorensen on July 27, 2009 at 2:05 PM
The eyes have it.... lovely image of this youngster! :toast:
Posted by Fran French on July 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM
Very nice Brett, you were lucky to get so close!

Fran :toast:
Posted by Lee Newman on July 28, 2009 at 5:28 PM
Super little owl image Brett. Nice detail & the eyes are stunning. Nice perch & bg too.

Lee