Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

horshoe bend

Discussion

7 replies
Posted by Nate Burgess on July 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM
horshoe bend
Took this a little while back... Not too sure about it yet..
Composite of 6 shots

Thoughts??
Posted by John Mumaw on July 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM
The midday light is kinda harsh, and the sky color is quite uneven.
Also, the bend in the river that really gives this scene its impact, as well as the far side of the river's edge has been cut off.
Posted by Nate Burgess on July 29, 2009 at 9:04 PM
I agree with the sky being uneven, not sure how to correct that. But in all honesty, on the web it looks nothing like it does in bridge or photoshop... so im not sure why it looks so harsh here.
Posted by Jim Casteel on July 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM
I find that it is because the image is probably not sRGB so when it gets displayed on the web it looks far worse than it does anywhere else. I do it regularly still.
Posted by Don George on July 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM
It may be the monitor I'm using (laptop) but the left side looks quite dark lacking detail.
Posted by CarlGandolfo on July 30, 2009 at 1:49 PM
Did you use a polarizer in any of the individual images?
Posted by Scott Fricke on July 31, 2009 at 12:22 PM
I'll second John's comment in regard to the river. To me it is the most important part of this scene and it is cut off.
Posted by Ken Wyatt on July 31, 2009 at 1:31 PM
I was going to say - that's a heck of a wide-angle lens!

I agree with the comments above. This is a nice first try. Horseshoe Bend is typically an early morning shot - or at the very least, best taken with some cloud cover. It appears you used a polarizing filter and/or auto-exposure, which can be problematic during panoramas. The dark area to the left detracts from the main subject. I do like the colors in the rocks, though.

Ken