Posted by Morris McClung on September 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM
Just another effort at star shots. I think this one turned out a little better, but still a long ways to go with these yet. This is a blend of a 30 sec. shot for the stars, and a 1 minute shot of Seivers and the aspen. I kind of like the funky colors from the moonlight. At least it looks more natural to me. I would love to know what you think.
Comments and critiques always welcome, and thanks for looking,
Morris
Posted by Darren Huski on September 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM
Looks good. Nice blend too.
Night work is fun and I stumble around trying these too. I want to try one the way Floris wrote about, but have not as of yet.
Posted by John Mumaw on September 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM
This is much better than your previous attempt, where the moonlight pretty much wiped out half the stars. You did a fine job here!
You might consider toning down the brightness of much of the right side just a shade for a more 'natural' look.
What ISO and lens aperture did you use to capture the night sky? I really wanna give this a go someday soon.
Posted by Todd Caudle on September 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM
Really cool shot, Morris!
Posted by Morris McClung on September 29, 2009 at 9:13 PM
Thanks guys! John, I used 1600 iso with the noise reduction on the 5d, and it was f 4.0, which was as wide open as my lens would go. I wish I had some 2.8 L glass. Seivers was face on to the moon which is why it is brighter, and it was a strong half moon, so I think it is as accurate as I can remember for the lighting.
Darren, I need to research Floris' approach and give it a shot, too.
Posted by Art Escobado on September 29, 2009 at 10:24 PM
I really like the star field. The foreground trees produce mixed results for me. They provide a sense of depth but then their "luminosity lack" throws me off since everything else has visibility.
Posted by Koveh Tavakkol on September 29, 2009 at 10:53 PM
I agree, much better. Less noise, great colors.
Posted by Amy Lindsey on September 30, 2009 at 1:06 AM
i really like it Morris!
Posted by Paul Wegemann on September 30, 2009 at 2:04 AM
I agree with John about the rhs, but yeah this is real cool!
Posted by Kurt Bowman on October 1, 2009 at 10:22 AM
I think the blending ooks great Morris. I kind of agree with what John says, but to me, what makes it look a little weird is not the brightness of the mountains, but the fact that the 2 trees are completely shaded in front of them. If they had some light or simply were not in the shot, I think it would make a big improvement.
Thanks Kurt. The trees in the lrc were in shadow from the moon behind Pyramid Peak. I thought since they were black they would lend themselves to it being a night shot. Next time I will have to try to include foreground elements in the moonlight.
Posted by Klaus Priebe on October 3, 2009 at 5:30 PM
Beautiful ! love it.
Posted by Kelly Black on October 5, 2009 at 2:03 AM
Discussion
15 repliesComments and critiques always welcome, and thanks for looking,
Morris
Night work is fun and I stumble around trying these too. I want to try one the way Floris wrote about, but have not as of yet.
You might consider toning down the brightness of much of the right side just a shade for a more 'natural' look.
What ISO and lens aperture did you use to capture the night sky? I really wanna give this a go someday soon.
Darren, I need to research Floris' approach and give it a shot, too.