I'm afraid this one doesn't really work for me Alan. I know you won't get the depth of field to put both birds in focus so for me I'd rather the second bird wasn't there.
Robert.
Posted by Nigel Blake on November 9, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Works for me Alan, the second bird adds a bit of "3D" to the image and takes it away from being just a "gull on a pool" shot; a slightly lower POV and the rest of the foreground bird's reflection would be the icing on the cake though!
Posted by Phil Shaw on November 10, 2009 at 8:15 AM
I think the composition works well. As Nigel has said having the full length reflection of the leading bird would have been desirable, since the reflection is pretty broken-up, it isn't really an issue for me.
Discussion
4 replies1D3
500f4
ISO 250
1/3200 @ f/5
Thanks for looking and for your comments
I think i would prefer them both to be infocus.
Cheers
Mark.G
Robert.